User talk:Disambiguator

This user may have left Wikipedia. Disambiguator has not edited Wikipedia since September 17, 2016. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome![edit]

Hello Disambiguator, and Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
Here are some good places to get you started:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please be sure to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or just three tildes (~~~) to produce your name only. If you have any questions, or are worried/confused about anything at all, please either visit the help desk, or leave a new message on my talk page at any time. Happy editing, good luck, and remember: Be Bold!

— FireFox • T • 13:29, 5 March 2006

Bravo for your "project" to improve Wikipedia's disambiguation pages! A couple of suggestions/requests, though (arising from your edits to Monocle (disambiguation)):

Per WP:MOSDAB, in most cases the links to articles being disambiguated should not be piped. The reason for this is that the actual name of the article is much more helpful to the person looking for that article than having every link appear with the ambiguous text (e.g. monocle or monocle is less clear than monocle (magazine) or monocle (comics).
Avoid adding entries to things that aren't ambiguous, like "The Monocled Mutineer". Disambiguation pages are not general indexes. They are aids for the case where someone has made a link to what they thought would be the most likely name, and got it wrong. Nobody would make the link "[[monocle]]" expecting it to lead to "The Monocled Mutineer" or The Emerald Monocle. When there are peripheral things like this that you really feel you have to include, put them in a separate "see also" section, rather than in the disambiguation list.

Thanks again for your cleanup efforts! They are much appreciated. Bad disambiguation pages are a pet peeve of mine, too.--Srleffler 23:07, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE:St Andrews Cathedral Priory[edit]

Short answer ... no. The Cathedral is the cathedral, the priory is the house for the monastic canons of the cathedral. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 09:28, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Walton[edit]

Hi - could you explain why you have amended the style of the birth dates on this disambiguation page, from (born → (b. ?? The change goes directly against the Manual of Style. I've reverted your change, pending your response. Disambiguator 21:12, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yes....reference WP:ABB. also protocol suggests that you talk before you revert. --emerson7 | Talk 21:18, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luke List (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:09, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest[edit]

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:20, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]