User talk:Days4EverFan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hey! I just reverted your edits on Chris Paciello's page because it seemed like it was removing a lot of relevant information. It being 20 years ago doesn't make it not relevant by Wikipedia's standards, and most of the content was about him and not his family. Rusalkii (talk) 18:39, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chris Paciello have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:52, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Chris Paciello, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Please discuss your proposed removal of referenced material on the article's talk page. I also note no mention of father or brother in the section you removed. Ifnord (talk) 19:58, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Raúl Esparza. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. STC1 talk 17:40, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eagleash (talk) 23:20, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Days4EverFan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 23:20, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Days4EverFan/sandbox[edit]

Information icon Hello, Days4EverFan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Days4EverFan/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]