User talk:Darcyisverycute/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Your submission at Articles for creation: Medicalisation of sexuality has been accepted

Medicalisation of sexuality, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lewcm Talk to me! 20:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Louisa Lawson House has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Louisa Lawson House. Thanks! BuySomeApples (talk) 17:35, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Medicalisation of sexuality has been nominated for WP:DYK by me

Template:Did you know nominations/Medicalisation of sexuality During the nomination, I and the reviewer may make edits before it displays on the main page. Cheers, Mach61 (talk) 06:43, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the nomination. I was considering a DYK nomination myself, but I couldn't think of any good phrases to use. Best wishes Darcyisverycute (talk) 08:04, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Louisa Lawson House has been accepted

Louisa Lawson House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 09:00, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Ways to improve Louisa Lawson House

Hello, Darcyisverycute,

Thank you for creating Louisa Lawson House.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi, Darcyisverycute Nice work!, Thank you for your contribution. Cheers!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dcotos (talk) 18:08, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder, I have deorphaned it. Darcyisverycute (talk) 02:38, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Darcyisverycute. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
• Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
• Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Fullerton Cove, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fullerton. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 15:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Deletion review for Hucksters.net

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Hucksters.net. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Foweirp (talk) 19:35, 12 January 2024 (UTC)