User talk:D A R C 12345/Archive 2013
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Disambiguation link notification for January 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomas I, bishop of Wrocław, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Grandson, Endowment and Gothic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Bishops of Wrocław
Hi! I noticed that you created a series of articles on the bishops of Wroclaw. Please be careful to add a space between the name of the bishop and the words "(Bishop of Wrocław)" (I've already fixed a few). Also, please be consistent with spelling; you named one article Haymo (Bishop of Wrocław), but you spelled his name in the article as Heymo.
הסרפד (call me “Hasirpad”) (formerly R——bo) 00:36, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- Also note that in Polish sources his name is also spelled Hajmo.
- הסרפד (call me “Hasirpad”) (formerly R——bo) 00:51, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Cyprian (Bishop of Wrocław) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Silesian
- Haymo (Bishop of Wrocław) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Lorraine
- Siroslaus I (Bishop of Wrocław) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Silesian
- Thomas II, bishop of Wrocław (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Canon
- Walter (Bishop of Wrocław) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Walloon
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
I've noticed that you're editing schools...
G'day. I noticed that you're editing up school articles (e.g. Castle Hill Public School). First of all, thanks for your work! Second, you might want to consider joining the Schools Wikiproject where we seek to improve those articles throughout the encyclopedia. I'd like to introduce you to, particularly, WP:WPSCH/AG which is the set of article guidelines that we've developed to address various issues with school articles. If you ever need any specific help, feel free to get in touch via my talkpage. ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 14:16, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Castle Hill Public School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Public School, Principal and Gothic
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Moresheth-Gath (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Ibn Ezra and Historia Ecclesiastica
- Peter Apselamus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Palestinian and Charity
- Macrinus (Bishop of Eleutheropolis) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Episcopal
- Zebennus (Bishop of Eleutheropolis) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Ecclesiastical History
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
|
Hello and welcome D A R C 12345/Archive 2013! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland, joining the project, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with our community. |
--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 20:13, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Characene (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Artabazos
- List of rulers of Parthian sub-kingdoms (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Artabazos
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:44, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Abinergaios II of Characene (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Kingdom
- Orabazes II of Characene (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Kingdom
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Naysān (Iraq), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Volintiri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Romanian and Russo-Turkish war
- Diocese of Riverina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to See
- Moiseyev (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Moldovan
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- HR 7722 b (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Eccentricity
- Wacław Seweryn Rzewuski (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Patriotic Society
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:45, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gee v Pritchard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Surry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jumbunna Coal Mine NL v Victorian Coal Miners’ Association, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 21:03, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Margaret of Cortona, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mistress (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Muhammed Nadir Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Henryk z Wierzbnej (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Nysa
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:09, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
May 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ancient Diocese of Oloron may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
|---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:06, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alexandria Carmania may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
|---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:42, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Ways to improve Tructémonde (Bishop of Oloron)
Hi, I'm Kieranian2001. D A R C 12345, thanks for creating Tructémonde (Bishop of Oloron)!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Reviewed, all articles especially historical articles need relevant citations.Kieranian2001 (talk) 13:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Kieranian2001 (talk) 13:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs
|
Thank you for your recent articles, including Henryk z Wierzbnej, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:20, 27 May 2013 (UTC) |
Please add b/d categories, interwiki links, stub templates and wikiproject templates to your articles
Like I did here: [1] and Talk:Henryk z Wierzbnej, for just one example. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:41, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Guillaume III. d'Assat (Bishop of Oloron) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Vatican
- Jean I. de Pardailhan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Cardinal
- Preczlaw of Pogarell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Cardinal
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:40, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Diversion of Water from the Meuse Case
At the Diversion of Water from the Meuse Case article, the citation needed tag is specifically for the claim that this is a landmark judgment or case, which is basically saying it made a major point and is a major case in some area. The citation you gave simply listed that it was a case of the PCIJ, with nothing about it's importance. Please leave the tag where it is until there is a citation or reference that describes the judgment/decision/case as "landmark". IMHO (talk) 03:37, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Alexandria Carmania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Qala
- Oscar Chinn Case (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to British
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:08, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Oscar Chinn Case
I'm not trying to pick on you, quite the contrary, I'm glad someone is adding even a little bit on some of the PCIJ cases, but I've added the citation needed tag to you reference of the case as a key case. Since there are so few, and since they all deal with international issues and concerns of at least two states, for me there is no issue about notability, but when you describe a case a "key" or "a landmark case" for the PCIJ itself or international law generally, I do think there needs to be a citation to a reputed publication that says just that.
Keep up the good work though. Definitely helpful to get these cases added. IMHO (talk) 02:05, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- S.S. "Wimbledon" case (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Neutrality
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of HD 23356 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HD 23356 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HD 23356 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 20:14, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of HD 166348 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HD 166348 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HD 166348 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 02:30, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Bogan-e Bala, Iran (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Iranshahr
- Havilah, New South Wales (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Homestead
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Gedko Powało (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Bishopric
- Marek (bishop of Płock) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Gregory VII
- Mikołaj Sówka z Gulczewa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Canon
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Piaseczno (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Orthodox
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
The article GJ 1062 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StringTheory11 (t • c) 03:02, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
The article GJ 1279 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StringTheory11 (t • c) 03:08, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Filip (bishop of Płock), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Correspondence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
The article Gliese 40 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StringTheory11 (t • c) 16:54, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
The article Gliese 42 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StringTheory11 (t • c) 16:56, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
The article Gliese 52 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StringTheory11 (t • c) 16:57, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
Just a note
You're obviously aware that I've been PRODing a lot of your articles lately, and I'm sorry if it appears that I'm WP:HOUNDing you with these nominations. Believe me, I'm not trying to; instead, I'm simply going through every star article on WP and PRODing or AfDing them if I believe that they fail to meet WP:NASTRO; I have no preference for or against your articles. I hope that you understand. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:00, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
The article Gliese 69 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:02, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
The article Gliese 146 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StringTheory11 (t • c) 22:04, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
The article Gliese 167 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StringTheory11 (t • c) 22:07, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Discussion of WP:PRODed star articles
Hi, I'm the WP:PROD patroller who saved Gliese 146 and edited it recently. You might be interested in this discussion on notability and whether it is appropriate to WP:PROD these stars.
As you will see, Graeme has offered to restore the deleted star articles on request. I notice some of your earlier star articles were deleted. What are your views? You might like to join the discussion here:
Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(astronomical_objects)#WP:PRODed_star_articles
Robert Walker (talk) 09:45, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Isidore of Charax (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Charax
- Jan Chojeński (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Polish
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
July 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Bishops of Poznań may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- | [[Pean (Bishop of Poznan|Pean]]
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:52, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Bishops
Hi, just wanted to say that I found the articles on bishops you've created very nice, an interesting read! Keep it up! :)Yakikaki (talk) 19:20, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Jan Latalski (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Envoy
- Pean (Bishop of Poznan) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Cardinal
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Gliese 481 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gliese 481 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 481 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 01:34, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Removing Speedy at Jakub z Sienna
Hi D A R C 12345, you recently removed a deletion tag from Jakub z Sienna. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove speedy deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the tag. Although the deletion proposal may be incorrect, removing the tag is not the correct way for you to contest the deletion, even if you are more experienced than the nominator. Instead, please use the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. Remember to be patient, there is no harm in waiting for another experienced user to review the deletion and judge what the right course of action is. As you are involved, and therefore potentially biased, you should refrain from doing this yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 07:35, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Gliese 532 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gliese 532 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 532 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 15:28, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Gliese 546 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gliese 546 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 546 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 15:39, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Gliese 556 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gliese 556 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 556 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Gliese 604 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gliese 604 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 604 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:24, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Gliese 613 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gliese 613 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 613 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:29, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Gliese 615 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gliese 615 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 615 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 19:17, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Jan Gruszczyński (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Unknown
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Gliese 726 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gliese 726 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 726 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 00:24, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
DYK for Mogiła Abbey
 | On 2 August 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mogiła Abbey, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the mandatory 13 brothers moved into the Mogiła Abbey around 1225? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mogiła Abbey. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Gliese 775 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gliese 775 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 775 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:30, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Gliese 818 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gliese 818 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 818 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:34, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Gliese 833 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gliese 833 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 833 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:36, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Gliese 868 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gliese 868 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 868 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:37, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Gliese 898 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gliese 898 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 898 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 03:41, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wilfred Harvey Schoff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tyre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Gliese 40 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gliese 40 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 40 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:26, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Gliese 42 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gliese 42 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 42 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:27, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Gliese 52 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gliese 52 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 52 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:28, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Gliese 69 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gliese 69 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 69 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:28, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Gliese 146 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gliese 146 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 146 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:29, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Gliese 167 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gliese 167 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 167 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:30, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Gliese 204 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gliese 204 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 204 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 23:18, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Gliese 269 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gliese 269 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 269 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 23:20, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Gliese 420 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gliese 420 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 420 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 23:26, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Andrzej Gryfita (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Brzeźnica
- Bernard (bishop of Płock) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Dominican
- Farah Citadel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Qala
- Florian Laskary of Kościelec (Bishop of Płock) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Polish
- Louis Bartholomew Załuski (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Cardinal
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
The article Phil Dooley (pastor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No sources advanced to show that the subject satisfies the general notability guideline. Seems to be a run-of-the-mill clergyman.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Deor (talk) 19:04, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of GJ 1279 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GJ 1279 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GJ 1279 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 21:46, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- Hi I suggest that you go to the AFD page for this at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GJ 1279 to argue for its retention. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:31, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of GJ 1062 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GJ 1062 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GJ 1062 (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 00:23, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Dobrapomoc (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Szkaradowo
- Pogorzela (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Tyszkiewicz Palace
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
The article Furrer v Snelling (1220) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable early law case. There's currently nothing to show why this case is important to the basis of law, and would need reliable sources claiming that importance.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Caffeyw (talk) 15:41, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
advice
As reviewing administrator, I have declined to immediately delete these articles, because it is quite possible that they do in fact constitute significant precedents (and the comments by subsequent courts and textbook writers that they are basic precedents would be reason for inclusion of the articles). Merely showing they are cited is not enough, -- it has to be clear these are import as precedents or teaching examples.
But you have not shown this. Unless you do, or unless somebody choose to do it, the articles will almost certainly be deleted. I advise you to fix the problem, and do this very quickly, before the article gets nominated for deletion by a regular deletion process.
Please don't enter further articles this way. It creates an unreasonable burden for other people to have to complete them. DGG ( talk ) 19:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Furrer v Snelling (1220), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rent, Covenant and Tennant (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- <ref>http://www.saverozelle.com/rozelle-village/So-what-exactly-is-part-3A What is Part3a]</ref> Although it was introduced to streamline the planning process and fast track the assessment
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:59, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Solskifte, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Northern (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
source that you used 3 years ago
See this edit you made 3 years ago in Mong, Punjab.
You cited Huntingford and Lendering, but there are no other details. Do you have the title of the books that you used? --Enric Naval (talk) 09:31, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Sorry! I don't want to discourage you, but I have deleted the information that you added to that article, and I'm here to explain why.
- That article is most specifically on Cathedrals. It is about how cathedrals function and what there role is. It isn't about large buildings that are sometimes loosely, or traditionally called "cathedral". That rules out Ulm Minster, St Peter's Basilica, Santa Maria Maggiore and various others.
- The article isn't about buildings, per se. There is a brief description of the ways in which cathedral buildings are utilised, but there is no detailed description of what cathedral buildings are generally like. The focus is on historic, social and cultural roles. So that is not the right place for a list like that.
- Look and Read, before you add. Basically, don't add content, without checking first. Start with the Table of Contents. A quick look at the subheadings, and the "See also" section would have directed you to a number of other articles where your addition might be more appropriate. Just above where you made the insertion was a "See also" direction to an article Architecture of cathedrals and great churches. OK! By it's name it tells you that information on St Peter's and Ulm Minster is going to be welcome on that page. It also tells you, at a glance , that the article deals with buildings, not with how a cathedral chapter is structured and matters of that type.
- One of the problems with not thinking through a lengthy addition, is that most "page watchers" are going to hesitate to remove it, unless they know for sure that the article doesn't include buildings like St Peter's. The onus is on the editor to get it right, because most people who watch for vandalism are not watching for well-intentioned but misplaced edits.
- There are already a number of pages of facts such as largest, tallest etc. There is a fair bit of dispute about the largest church building. AS for the height of spires, well, you have to leave the word "cathedral" out of that, because Ulm etc etc.
- On the other hand, I think that some fun facts at the end of that article (the architecture one) wouldn't go astray. You need to reference every single fact.
- The article Cathedral, you may have noticed, is poorly referenced. Some of the oldest articles on Wikipedia have very few references. But any new info ought to be fully referenced. The Architecture of cathedrals article is referenced.
- The other suggestion is that there might be a place for another list. You would have to check out all the church and cathedral lists first, before creating.
Amandajm (talk) 02:59, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
- I was just taking a good look at some of the info to see what might be useful.
- Oldest is problematic because buildings have been muddled up that are ancient, but originally served a different purpose, and churches that are genuinely of very ancient foundation.
- Strangest is not a goer. It is a purely subjective category. In fact, if you compare the centrally-planned, tall buildings of recent times, you find that they might be different from earlier buildings, but are not unusual compared with other recent cathedrals. Likewise Brasilia Cathedral isn't unusual if compared with Liverpool Roman Catholic Cathedral and other churches built at that time.
- Check out the existent lists of oldest, largest tallest and see if you can find references. The lists need to refer to "church" rather than "cathedral" because the functional category is too small, and excludes most basilicas and Orthodox churches. Amandajm (talk) 03:12, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
October 2013
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Davud (name), as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. adding an entry is obviously not a minor edit Dougweller (talk) 05:54, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomas Beirne (businessman), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pounds (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bond v Commonwealth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pound (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wilyakali, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Silverton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Paarkantji (People) may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- the [[Pama–Nyungan languages|Pama–Nyungan languages]] [[ Sprachbund]], and one of the three Major [[Australian Aborigines|[[Aboriginal]] [[Macro-Pama–Nyungan languages|language groups]] for the [[
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:55, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Aya Sofya may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Gazetteer, "Nicæa"]</ref> It was modelled after the larger [[Hagia Sophia]] in [[Constantinople]]), and it was in this building that the [[Second Council of Nicaea]] met in 787 to discuss the [[
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:30, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ships of James Cook may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- the Royal Navy]] (Rev. ed.). [[London]]: Chatham Publishing. ISBN 978-1-86176-281-8. OCLC 67375475.]]</ref>
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:21, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Barthélémy-Jean-Baptiste Sanadon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Basque, Electorate, Sainte-Marie, See and Pau
- Château de la Motte-Glain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Charles IX and Charles VIII
- Agustius (Bishop) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to See
- Akiba v Commonwealth (2013) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Federal court
- Amat d'Oloron (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Gregory VII
- Ancient Diocese of Bazas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Cardinal
- Château de la Mothe-Chandeniers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to English
- Giovanni Salviati (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Cardinal
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ships of James Cook, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Captain and Hawai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Piotr Myszkowski (bishop) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Dominican and Jastrzębiec
- Jacob from Sienno (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Chamberlain
- Michał Nowodworski (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Patriot
- Paweł Antoni Załuski (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Bishop of Kiev
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:15, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Louis II de Beaumont-Bressuire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to French, Chamberlain, Châtillon and Gensac
- Wincenty Kot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Cardinal, Zbigniew Oleśnicki, The Vatican and Statesman
- Jacques de Foix (Infante de Navarra) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Mistress and Eleanor of Aragon
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
December 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jacques de Foix (Infante de Navarra) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- about 1470 he was the ninth son of [[Gaston IV, Count of Foix|Gaston IV]], [[Count of Foix]] and [[[[County of Bigorre#House of Foix|Bigorre]], [[Viscount of Béarn]], and his wife [[Eleanor of
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:35, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Jacques de Foix (Infante de Navarra) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Royalty
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Bolsena Lacus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Degree
- Eyre Lacuna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Titan
- Lake Mackay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Titan
- Louis de Beaumont, 2nd Count de Lerín (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Viana
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Gliese 611 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gliese 611 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 611 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 21:44, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
| This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |