User talk:D.Lazard

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Safe Primes, in RSA[edit]

Ok, let's try to discuss here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:RSA_(cryptosystem)#Safe_Primes,_in_RSA_Key_Generation No "reliable sources" are needed here. Here you just need to think with your own head. This is math. In any case, I do not owe you anything, and I do not demand anything from you.

Coordinate Systems and Analytic Geometry[edit]

Moved to Talk:Cartesian coordinate system

– Nothing personal in this discussion

Reverted edit over at determinant[edit]

Hello! I saw you reverted my edit over at determinant with the reason WP:NOTBROKEN. I understand your reasoning and after reading the NOTBROKEN guidelines I have decide to edit the linear isomorphism redirect to achieve the same result as my edit did before it was reverted. I just thought I'd leave a message here to check that this is OK. Cheers. AlexGallon (talk) 19:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To editor AlexGallon: this is not OK: a reader who search for "linear isomorphism" is probably not aware of the technical details referred to in the considered section, which begins with a symbol not definied in the section. So, it is definitively more helpful to redirect the reader to the lead of the article where "linear isomorphism" is defined and bolded. So, there is no reason for changing the target of the link. My reference to WP:NOTBROKEN meant that the previous link was perfectly convenient, and did not be fixed by linking elsewhere. Sorry if this does not correspond to the text of WP:NOTBROKEN, but only to its spirit: a link that is not broken must not be changed, unless this provides a clear improvement. D.Lazard (talk) 08:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I had not noticed that "linear isomorphism" was defined and bolded in the lead section of the linear map article. Thank you for pointing this out. Given this, I agree that it does seem reasonable for the link to be to the top of the article rather than the specific section. AlexGallon (talk) 09:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Pagiarism[edit]

Idiot D.Lazard, someone else's contribution is not your wife's *** that anybody can nail it without proper reference. Stop PLAGIARISM, you fu***** idiot. 2409:4081:2B14:293D:0:0:4309:9504 (talk) 23:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]