User talk:Cyberxperts

Please do not re-add those links to the Jhelum page, that page is a disambiguation page and all links like the ones you put in should be in the external link sections of the more specific articles, if they are appropriate.--Konstable 10:49, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't move any more pages without gaining consensus. Addhoc (talk) 03:49, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Jhelum[edit]

Portal:Jhelum, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Jhelum and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Jhelum during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

Portal:Jhelum[edit]

Why do you insist on name Jhelum Portal instead of The Jhelum Portal despite of the fact that all the other portals of Pakistani cities are like The Lahore Portal, The Karachi Portal etc. I am again changing it to The Jhelum Portal. --Talha^Discuss ^© 10:47, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jhelum tehsil[edit]

you have done totally wrong by moving Jhelum Tehsil to Jhelum (city). All the other cities have seperate articles for tehsil ahd city. It is required to have saperate articles at certain moment, like here: Template:Tehsils of Punjab (Pakistan). Now i am looking how to undo this move. Please be carefull in future. --Talha^Discuss ^© 11:40, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apnajhelum[edit]

Put yourself in my shoes. If I told you that Pakistan.Com is the official website of Pakistan, would you believe me or would you believe that Pakistan.Gov.Pk is the official website of the country? Usually the official website of a country, state/province or city/town would be a DOT-GOV or similar website because these are setup and controlled directly by the relevant government or an appointed agent of that government. In certain countries the official websites are a little different; Cuba for example has very few DOT-GOV-DOT-CU but there are also severe restrictions on other Cuban websites. In the case of Jhelum, it is not good enough that you say that apnajhelum.com is the official website or you say the district coordination officer has declared apnajhelum.com is the official website. You need to satisfy the Wikipedia requirement of a reliable source declaring apnajhelum as the official website. A reliable source can be:

.edu.pk (educational institutions)
.gov.pk (federal government)
.gob.pk (government of Balochistan)
.gok.pk (government of Azad Kashmir)
.gon.pk (government of NWFP)
.gop.pk (government of Punjab)
.gos.pk (government of Sindh)
or a reliable newspaper website like Jang or Dawn

Green Giant (talk) 20:20, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is a reliable source.--Talha^Discuss ^© 16:17, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Admin's Barnstar
	great Cyberxperts (talk) 05:50, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011[edit]

Hello Cyberxperts. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Jhelum, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. The website that you are adding is quite obviously run by the company that your username represents (which is also a violation of our username policy. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 14:03, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Join us at FB[edit]

Hello Pakistanis Wikipedians! Assalam-o-Alaikum, I hope you are enjoying editing Wikipedia and helping around. I want to join every Pakistani Wikipedian on facebook so I hope you would like to join us in our community. We would/could help each other and make Pakistani articles more better.

Join us:

Group: Pakistani Wikipedians
Page: Pakistani Wikipedians

And then sign my guestbook for memories.

Regards: -- Captain Wikipedia! ^{( T - C - G )} 09:16, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jhelum Networks for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jhelum Networks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jhelum Networks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 17:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rehbar Development Foundation for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rehbar Development Foundation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rehbar Development Foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 18:05, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]