User talk:Curiouscontributions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

A cup of hot tea to welcome you!

Hello, Curiouscontributions, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, If you need help visit the Teahouse or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Sm8900 (talk) 03:11, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. The page User:Curiouscontributions has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 331dot (talk) 12:55, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a place to post your resume. 331dot (talk) 12:55, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amod Kumar, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikishovel (talk) 06:08, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amod Kumar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wikishovel (talk) 07:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, Curiouscontributions. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Amod Kumar, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 07:46, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have not been paid or related to Mr Amod kumar in anyway personally or professionally. Being my first time as wikipedia editor writing the page , I wanted to write about someone who's work I have been closely following for few years now. Mr Amod is a notable person in the development sector. Interest in his work prompted me to make him the subject of my first article. Curiouscontributions (talk) 12:28, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Amod Kumar has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 331dot (talk) 10:05, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article was written in neurtal tone without use of peacock words and puffery. The article has well researched and referenced content. The person is a notable person who has made signifiicant contributions to the development sector and created huge impact. Request you to allow the article to go through editors review and any changes suggested hence so will be made in the article Curiouscontributions (talk) 10:16, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  331dot (talk) 10:06, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I am a new editor learning wikipedia. I have tried to add content about a notable person. I have tried to follow all the wikipedia guidelines including and not limited to ensuring the article is encyclopefdia and is written in neutral tone. Being new to Wikipedia, it is a new space with steep learning curve. Request to unblock me to enable me to learn and grow more so that i can contribute more in meaningful way. Curiouscontributions (talk) 10:12, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
To request unblock, please follow the instructions provided. Your drafts had no independent reliable sources with significant coverage of this government employee and what makes him important/significant/influential- what we call notability. If you have a connection to this person, please read conflict of interest and paid editing. 331dot (talk) 10:17, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Applealing block[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Curiouscontributions (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi. I am a new editor learning wikipedia. I have tried to add content about a notable person. I have gone through the notability criteria and credibility of the references. Request to unblock me to enable me to learn and grow more so that I can contribute more meaningfully.

Decline reason:

This does not address your violation of WP:COI and makes me think you believe your contributions were appropriate. Yamla (talk) 10:41, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The person of interest in the article has not paid me for writing the article. However, I will go through rigourously the guidlines of Wikipedia including copy right infringement and advertising or using promotional tone of the article and ensure to get sufficient understanding before I post again. Request to unblock me to allow me to continue learning about Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Curiouscontributions (talkcontribs)

Once you have understanding, you may request unblock at that time. You must make a new unblock request and specifically speak to what was wrong with your edits and what you will do differently. You must also describe your connection with this person or how you came to edit about them. 331dot (talk) 11:04, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Applealing block[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Curiouscontributions (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is my first article; it has taken me time and trials to understand the user guidelines and rules. There are two major issues with which my account was flagged: COI and advertising/spam. COI : I have been interested in and searching for a way to contribute to Wikipedia for quite some time now. I have made this wiki page for Mr. Amod Kumar, whom I've been following for a few years now. Coming from the development sector and seeing the work done by him, my keen enthusiasm to learn more about Wikipedia has prompted me to write a page. I have in no way been paid to or am not related to Amod Kumar in any way personally or professionally. His notable work in the fields of development and public health as an IAS officer in my region encouraged me to make him the subject of my first Wikipedia page. Promotion/advertising: The information was taken from Mr. Amod Kumar's website and modified. I was not fully aware of the guidelines for creating content. I now understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and the content in no way should be advertising or intended to promote an individual. It is essential to ensure the content has a neutral tone so that there are no biases or false information being propagated. Through each speedy deletion, I have understood and learned how to improve my content for Wikipedia. I have gone through the relevant guidelines thoroughly to ensure this doesn't repeat again, and I request that I am once again given the opportunity to contribute to the wiki in a meaningful way.

Decline reason:

No response to query below in six days. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:14, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What kinds of articles would you be working on if unblocked? - UtherSRG (talk) 20:01, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]