User talk:Copiacertificada

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nuria Perpinya (November 7)[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 13:26, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Copiacertificada, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
I attempted a response to your question.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 22:52, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You asked for help on my talk page.
There are numerous problems with this article that have to be solved before it can be considered. The present tense is used where it should be past tense. The references are not properly formatted. You need to use <ref>Citation</ref> rather than footnote numbers. Each citation should appear after the information it verifies. There are no links to other Wikipedia articles, and section headings should be in the format ==Section heading== which automatically generates a table of contents.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:25, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think the article is probably ready, except for a few things. I corrected some errors I knew how to correct. One thing you should never do is have a link in the article to another web site, other than in the references. All links in the article itself should go to other Wikipedia articles. There can be an "External links" section, and you have something like that where you list the books, so that's where those links should go. If the books themselves cannot qualify for an article, it may be best just to use italics and not link within the article.
The advice for moving the article is found at HELP:MOVE. It works differently for me, but there are directions there for how to find where you click to move the article. It took me a while to learn this after they changed the procedure, but to the left of the current article name is an arrow. Click on that arrow and select "(Article)". Then what you do is remove your username where it asks for the article name. Whether the accent marks should appear or not I am not sure, but you could remove them at that time if it was appropriate. I would say just leave them and we can do a redirect with the name that does not have accent marks. Finally, after the move, go back to User:Copiacertificada/Núria Perpinyà (you will get sent to the new article name, but click on this title which is in blue after "Redirected from" at the top of the page) and put {{db-author}} in place of the "redirect" text.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:19, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

thanks a lot Vchimpanzee! Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · OI've been very busy the last months, but now the article is already ready on line! --Copiacertificada (talk) 18:26, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Copiacertificada, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! - David Biddulph (talk) 05:19, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are also several other useful links in the feedback box at the top of your AFC submission. - David Biddulph (talk) 05:21, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

After I told you that there are useful links in the feedback box at the top of your AFC submission, you twice deleted the feedback, and I have now twice placed it. The feedback stays in the draft unless & until the draft is accepted. It is there to help you, and to help future reviewers (and to give you the resubmit button when you are ready to resubmit after addressing the points from the previous review). --David Biddulph (talk) 17:39, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nuria Perpinya (November 7)[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 13:26, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Copiacertificada, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
I attempted a response to your question.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 22:52, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You asked for help on my talk page.
There are numerous problems with this article that have to be solved before it can be considered. The present tense is used where it should be past tense. The references are not properly formatted. You need to use <ref>Citation</ref> rather than footnote numbers. Each citation should appear after the information it verifies. There are no links to other Wikipedia articles, and section headings should be in the format ==Section heading== which automatically generates a table of contents.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:25, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I looked at the article and it looks more like an article should. When you said the article had the wrong title, it was because you created it on your user page. I have moved your draft article to the correct place, but I'm not clear on why you didn't create it again at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nuria Perpinya. It would be better if you did that, and I'm not sure what you should do now. If you click on User:Copiacertificada and follow the link to see what you should do with that page now, you can have a user page explaining what you do at Wikipedia.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 17:36, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I asked a question here so whatever advice you are given there, please follow it.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 17:45, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If the article is approved you can move it to Nuria Perpinya, but I'm not clear on whether that's going to be the correct title. Since I can't see your sources I can't say whether they are the right kind (and I don't speak Spanish well enough if I could), but you still have not addressed the present tense problem. I personally don't see anything wrong with the sources, just at first glance.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 14:45, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You have a response at User talk:FoCuSandLeArN. Apparently your sources may be acceptable but this person had difficulty figuring out what was going on. If you fix the reference formatting, all should be fine. I may be able to help with that.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:21, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Vchimpanze and FoCuSandLeArN: I think all the things are done and fixed, except the name of the article of wikipedia and the name of the photo of the writer. Instead of be: "user:copiacertificada/Nuria Perpinya" must to be in both just: "Nuria Perpinya". Do you how to erase the name of "copia certificada"? Or perhaps it will be automatically erased as soon as the article will be published. What's the next step I can do to be the new article aproved and published? Just to wait for? Thank you --Copiacertificada (talk) 14:09, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was mentioned to you back in April that you must not have external links in the body of the article. Apart from the very limited cases permitted in an External links section, you may want to change some of the others to references. --David Biddulph (talk) 14:22, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 10 April[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, the above error was caused by your adding a crossref to 'Hussley' without actually adding the citation. Could you please locate the book you used, and add the book's title, author, publisher, year, and pages cited? That would be very helpful. It would look like this: <ref name=Hussley>Hussley, Forename. ''Title goes here''. Publisher, Year.</ref> Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:19, 15 April 2014 (UTC) Thanks for your help--Copiacertificada (talk) 15:34, 29 April 2014 (UTC), Chiswick Chap. The broken reference is already fixed.[reply]

Hussley (?) vs Hussey (a real author)[edit]

Hi again, I see you tried reverting my correction. Could you please take a look at the spelling as it seems to be Christopher Hussey, whose book on the Picturesque came out with Putnam's (and maybe other publishers in other cities) in 1927, and has been reprinted a few times since. I don't think there's a man called Hussley in this field. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:43, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, in the same text i've written hussey and hussley. Sorry for the error of spelling. It's already fixed. Thanks.--Copiacertificada (talk) 13:29, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh good, I'm glad we are agreed on that, so the reference I added to Hussey's book must be correct. I had also wikilinked Christopher Hussey (as well as Gilpin, one of the pioneers of the picturesque, so I'm not clear why you're removing these links, or publication details of Hussey's book? I'm sure you have a plan in mind; if you share it with me, we can work out how to improve the article. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:33, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Núria Perpinyà[edit]

Hi, I'm Andrewright. Copiacertificada, thanks for creating Núria Perpinyà!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add to a category that would be wonderful.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. S Blake 14:23, 26 August 2014 (UTC) Many thanks Andrewright!, I'll do as you adviced to me. You're right, I've forgot the categoritzation of the article, and it's very useful, as you said. --Copiacertificada (talk) 18:23, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan[edit]

Please don't keep removing the orphan tag while the article remains an orphan. There are no links from any Wikipedia articles to Núria_Perpinyà, see here. If you are struggling to remember what an orphan is, read the links in the tag, particularly WP:Orphan. --David Biddulph (talk) 15:08, 3 September 2014 (UTC) Ok, thanks!--Copiacertificada (talk) 17:02, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Black existentialism may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:13, 18 September 2014 (UTC) Many thanks! I've remnove it --Copiacertificada (talk) 16:21, 18 September 2014 (UTC) It's seems solved the unparied brackets remaining--Copiacertificada (talk) 18:32, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nuria Perpinya concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nuria Perpinya, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Got[edit]

Regarding your recent edit to A Game of Thrones, can you confirm that Núria Perpinyà is talking about the novel and not the TV series in her essay? Thanks.— TAnthonyTalk 22:31, 25 February 2015 (UTC) Yes, that's right--Copiacertificada (talk) 18:26, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Núria Perpinyà, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chaos. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Copiacertificada&oldid=1138275064"