User talk:Commonedits

August 2022[edit]

Cunard Thank you so much for your vote, help and support in the WP:DELREV of Bhumika Gurung. I know you are not interested in my thank you as I am considered someone really despicable. Anyhow a big thank you for what you did as now I can peacefully retire from Wikipedia completely. Wishing you all the very best for your edits! Have a great day! Commonedits (talk) 11:10, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commonedits, I am happy to help and don't consider you despicable. I can understand your frustrations at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2022 July 27#Bhumika Gurung as it is challenging to recreate articles that have been protected from recreation. However, Tamzin (talk · contribs)'s block is understandable and supported by policy given your comments violated Wikipedia:No personal attacks. I hope admins will be willing to unblock you if you commit to not making comments like that again though you may have to wait a while as this is your fourth block for personal attacks. I hope you will be unblocked in the future as you've made good contributions here though I understand if you do not want to return. Best wishes. Cunard (talk) 05:21, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cunard Thank you so much once again Commonedits (talk) 07:15, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Commonedits (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been off for a while and not been editing for sometime now. I would like to make valuable contributions without making any personal attack comments on other editors. So please consider unblocking me. Commonedits (talk) 07:08, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That is insufficient. This is a collaborative project, where avoidance of communicating with others is not possible. You need to be able to know how to work through editing disputes- which are inevitable here. If you don't think that you can do that, then this project isn't for you. There is nothing wrong with that, and it does not make you a bad person, but this sort of thing isn't for everyone. 331dot (talk) 10:24, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What steps will you take to avoid making personal attacks? 331dot (talk) 09:19, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Commonedits (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not talk to any editor nor talk about any editor anywhere. I will make valuable contributions and leave Wikipedia after I finish making those contributions.Commonedits (talk) 10:22, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There was some broken markup up here and it never got properly declined as a duplicate. Normally a blocking admin isn't supposed to decline unblock requests, but this decline is purely procedural in nature. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 11:37, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Let me butt in and try this. Please describe each of the steps in resolving disputes. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:40, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Commonedits (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will work through editing disputes and communicate with the other editors in a reasonable manner. Please consider unblocking me by giving me one last chance Commonedits (talk) 10:29, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Well, this is awkward because I don't remember why exactly I ran a CU on you. The rationale I used was "suspect further personal attacks while logged out". I don't remember what I found, and I don't really want to go digging for it. That means it's basically irrelevant until I do so. However, I did tag a sock puppet, User:Only Smiles No Tears, and I'm now pretty sure that I can say you're also Confirmed to User:Creativitylove. I think you've also been continuing to edit while logged out. You need to explain this sock puppetry to be unblocked. And if I see any more logged out edits or new accounts, I'm going to do range blocks. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:16, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Deepfriedokra I) Go the talk page of the editor with whom there is an editing dispute or the talk page of the article where there's a dispute. II) Start a discussion on the dispute with the editor III) Discuss amicably on the pros and cons of the edit. IV) Finding a solution together on what can be the best edit possible in the article.Commonedits (talk) 12:00, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note that, since the unblock request was filed, this has been upgraded to a CUblock. Note also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Creativitylove. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 21:05, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Commonedits (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven't used the other accounts to personally attack anyone. Neither have I used them for abuse. You can check the edit history. Then why is that am I even blocked for sockpuppetry? Commonedits (talk) 01:10, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Closing as stale only, you may make a new request. 331dot (talk) 12:09, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) Commonedits, Would you kindly list all accounts you have used, whether previously or now? Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 03:13, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mathglot Only Smiles and Tears was my account. Creativitylove is my best friend's account but since we both come from the same place, our IP address were same so he too got blocked for sockpuppetry.Commonedits (talk) 03:31, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming you meant Only Smiles No Tears (talk · contribs) as the other account. Your comment about "same IP address" as a different editor seems problematic, but I'll leave that for others to dispose. By the way, please watch your indentation on reply comments; have a read of WP:THREAD for how to reply, and how to indent your comments. Thanks, and good luck, Mathglot (talk) 04:12, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What have you used your other accounts for? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:32, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deepfriedokra Actually I wanted to create WP articles using one account which is when I created Only Smiles No Tears but in the middle I lost it's password so I created Commonedits. However, I have used very less my first account once I created Commonedits and I have never used the two simultaneously for personally attacking anyone or for abuse. Creativitylove is my best friend's account. He was having his boards when he created the account last year so he wasn't much active here after creating some articles and he doesn't have much time to edit here.Commonedits (talk) 03:58, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ima leave this for one of the SPI people to unravel. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:49, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did notice some behavioral differences with Creativitylove, enough so that I asked TheSandDoctor to make the final call on blocking them, as it wasn't clear-cut enough for me to play judge, jury, and executioner. I don't know about TSD, but it seems plausible to me that CE and CL are two different people. What this doesn't address, though, is that canvassing a friend to go advocate for your position in a discussion where you've engaged in blockable personal attacks is not okay. Until CE can acknowledge that, I don't think an unblock should be granted. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 11:37, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tamzin Okay I acknowledge that I shouldn't have canvassing a friend to go advocate for a position in a discussion where I'm engaged in blockable personal attacks. However, I would like to add on that I asked him to make a vote but whatever he voted was his own will. Nevertheless, it was still a mistake from my side and I assure I wouldn't repeat it once again so I request you to please unblock both me and CL. I will do my edits and let him do his edits.Commonedits (talk) 07:34, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]