User talk:Clofback

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of books about the RMS Titanic (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Quasar G. was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of books about the RMS Titanic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Quasar G. (talk) 11:10, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Clofback, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Quasar G. (talk) 11:10, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:List of books about the RMS Titanic concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of books about the RMS Titanic, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:55, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of books about the RMS Titanic

Hello, Clofback. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of books about the RMS Titanic".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:30, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pull Over (James Taylor video album) (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pull Over (James Taylor video album) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 03:59, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pull Over (James Taylor video album) (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hamtechperson was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pull Over (James Taylor video album) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hamtechperson 18:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Clofback and a belated welcome to Wikipedia! I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help one get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are interested in learning more about contributing, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Worldbruce (talk) 00:46, 4 December 2017 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Draft:Pull Over (James Taylor video album) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Pull Over (James Taylor video album), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Pull Over (James Taylor video album)

Hello, Clofback. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pull Over".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 19:03, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

"Grandaunt"

Please stop changing the normal term great-aunt into the obscure term "grandaunt". DuncanHill (talk) 14:46, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

But...Grandaunt is the correct terminology, and it is correctly used in many other places on Wikipedia. See also the comments in the "Aunt" article. I think Wikipedia should prefer accuracy over popularity, and great-aunt is just not accurate, even if it is commonly used.

What are your thoughts on this?

Also, is there a standard for these things somewhere? If so, I'd like to review it to make sure I'm following any published guidelines.

Thanks for the feedback! Clofback (talk) 15:09, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Is "grandaunt" perhaps an Americanism? It certainly is not "correct" in British English. DuncanHill (talk) 15:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Absolutely not correct, really not worth starting a crusade over what you see as accuracy, and not helped by the mess you made at Coraline. Please slow down and get some kind of consensus. I hope and I pray that there is NOT a published guideline but instead we just use common sense and avoid this sort of thing. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 15:17, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, what happened to Coraline? Clofback (talk) 15:20, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

OK, no need for a crusade. That's not my intent. But if it is absolutely incorrect, then the "Aunt" page should be changed to reflect that. As a user, I would consider that article as authoritative. Clofback (talk) 15:23, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

That could be. If so, maybe the "Aunt" article needs a notation to that effect. But using grandaunt is consistent with the "Aunt" article. Take a look at the chart on the page. Clofback (talk) 15:18, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

The article uses both. The chart is not a WP:RS. Oxford Dictionaries, as used as a citation, are. DuncanHill (talk) 15:22, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Ah, OK, that helps. Sorry, I would have referred to Oxford if I'd known that was the standard for words and grammar. Clofback (talk) 15:28, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Oxford isn't the standard - there isn't a single standard, and articles may be written in different varieties of English. However, all of the dictionaries used as sources in the Aunt article make it clear that great-aunt is the normal term - the definition of 'grand aunt' is, in all cases, something along the lines of 'another term for a great-aunt'. The Google n-gram linked to in the article ([Google Ngram Viewer here it is]) also makes it clear that the most common variation by far is great-aunt (hyphenated), followed by 'great aunt' (two words), followed by 'greataunt' (one word); only after those three variants to we get to 'grandaunt', 'grand-aunt' and 'grand aunt'. Great-aunt, being by far the most common, is what we should use. Girth Summit _(blether) 15:30, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Gotcha. I'll undo the changes I made. Sorry for the confusion. As an engineer, I guess I'm overly obsessed with rules, guidelines, and standards. Clofback (talk) 15:36, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Bless you for your nice replies and positive attitude! I am not quite sure what happened to poor Coraline but it looks like a bit of your edit summary perhaps migrated into a userbox parameter, which had the effect of blowing the poster pic out of the water because the infobox didn't know what this new parameter was ... and so on. No harm done! I was a bit stroppy about it, and I am sorry – this was before I realized your serious intent. Cheers and happy editing DBaK (talk) 15:49, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

No worries! It's great to see that there are folks monitoring the articles and stepping in to prevent issues. Gives me more confidence in Wikipedia. Thanks Clofback (talk) 16:05, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Berkeley, July 1, 1978 (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Berkeley, July 1, 1978 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:29, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Berkeley, July 1, 1978 (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Berkeley, July 1, 1978 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 17:26, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Berkeley, July 1, 1978

Hello, Clofback. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Berkeley, July 1, 1978, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:04, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Berkeley, July 1, 1978

Hello, Clofback. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Berkeley".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:26, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)