Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you. --The Ungovernable Force 09:51, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Notice my attempt at removing them
== Please Do Not Remove Warnings ==
Please do not remove messages from your talk page. Talk pages exist as a record of communication, and in any case, comments are available through the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted comments. Thanks. --The Ungovernable Force 02:04, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I saw that you asked why the AXXo talk page was deleted. It is standard practice to delete talk pages to articles that don't exist. The article has been deleted and salted. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 23:00, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
that talk page was the only way I could get information about AXXo. The topic has some relevance since people do search for it. --Chrisdab 01:22, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, you said on my talk page:
I saw that you asked why the AXXo talk page was deleted. It is standard practice to delete talk pages to articles that don't exist. The article has been deleted and salted. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 23:00, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
There is at least some importance to this topic though, since people do make searches and post inquiries into the AXXo talk page. When will there be a process for reinstatement, since the link on the aXXo page gives me no information to appeal an article post deletion.--Chrisdab 01:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Goodness no, the person does not appear to meet any feasible definition of Wikipedia's notability clause. Regards, CHAIRBOY (☎) 02:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Let me modify that slightly, there's deletion review, though I can say with utmost confidence that the article will remain deleted. When the gentleman is featured on CNN, perhaps it might be revisited, but realistically... no, ain't gonna happen. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 02:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I saw that you were hoping to get the aXXo article started up again. I've started a aXXo-beta that I hope you can expand and make better -- Esemono (talk) 14:42, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Tetrahydrocannabinol. Thank you. --Slashme (talk) 06:14, 14 December 2007 (UTC)