User talk:Chisnallmarty

January 2020

Hello, I'm Celia Homeford. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of current pretenders, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Celia Homeford (talk) 08:05, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to List of current pretenders. Thank you. Celia Homeford (talk) 15:22, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at List of current pretenders shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DrKay (talk) 18:48, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

You've been warned before about edit-warring and the need for proper sourcing. I also remind you that there was a talk page discussion about this issue at Talk:List of current pretenders#Time to remove all unsourced entries in the list? DrKay (talk) 15:00, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Carlos Felipe de Habsburgo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Carlos Felipe de Habsburgo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 14:46, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Carlos Felipe de Habsburgo.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Carlos Felipe de Habsburgo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:27, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Philipp von Hessen

The article Philipp von Hessen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. buidhe 21:37, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chisnallmarty. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 16:24, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Per your messages on my talk page, it's fairly obvious that you're the IP editor that was previously blocked for disruptive editing on that page. I've blocked this account to match that block. Please note; you, the person behind this account are blocked. Until that block is successfully lifted, or expires, you are not welcome to edit Wikipedia. Kuru (talk) 21:45, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

UTRS 30708

https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/appeal/30708 is open. As the SPI mentioned check user logs, I told user to consider appealing to ArbCom. I see no other recourse for them. In https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/appeal/30499, they threatended legal action. That request was declined as not addressing reason for block.. @L235 and Kuru: courtesy notifications. --Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 02:27, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up, Deepfriedokra. I have no plans to unblock this user; if the user still wants an unblock, an ArbCom appeal is the appropriate next step. Best, Kevin (alt of L235 · t · c) 02:34, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/appeal/30708 is now closed. My response:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Per mine and Kevin's comments, apart from the SPI and having not looked at the other account, there are serious problems with your edits on this account in terms of edit warring, battling, incivilty and copyright. These would all need to be addressed. Any appeal must also address the original concerns warranting a block on the master account as well as the sockpuppetry. If you feel this response is inappropriate in any way, your best option is to appeal to ArbCom. They will need to consider the issues raised at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mythology3757/Archive, which include check user information. Thanks.

--Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 18:55, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Carlos Felipe of Habsburg

Hello, Chisnallmarty. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Carlos Felipe of Habsburg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 12:14, 11 July 2020 (UTC)