User talk:CharlesWTrowbridge

Mark the Match Boy Challenge[edit]

Mr. Trowbridge:

To put Mark the Match Boy out there without linking it to Alger and the Alger Myth, of which it is perhaps one of the most representative samples, taught in classrooms across America, is quite incomplete. The viewpoint is also taught in college as one which conservatives have long ascribed. None of the information provided that you reversed on that page was inaccurate or irrelevant, and was directly grounded in pages commonly available in Wikipedia. Please respond before I revise, but if you do not include the linkages to the relevant reference materials here on the Wiki you will be challenged for your edit.

Thank you

TheCleverTwit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theclevertwit (talk • contribs) 14:58, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The material was deleted because it was unsourced. Additionally, it was a broad statement about Alger's work in general and not specifically about Mark. I'll add a 'See also' section to link the Alger Myth to the Mark article. CharlesWTrowbridge (talk) 02:38, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello, CharlesWTrowbridge! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! CharlieDelta (talk) 12:29, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

September 2011[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. CutOffTies (talk) 18:57, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jane McDowell Foster[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jane McDowell Foster requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bgwhite (talk) 21:38, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note, I have removed this as there is a claim of notability. --CutOffTies (talk) 21:46, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great work on a generally neglected set of articles[edit]

		The Music Barnstar
		For your work on Stephen Foster's songs. cmadler (talk) 12:41, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Song lyrics[edit]

A few suggestions: Consider integrating song lyrics into commentary, as in Old Dan Tucker, or add them to Wikisource and link there. Also, consider providing a citation (e.g. to an online scan of original sheet music or to a reliable source) for the lyrics, especially when, as in the case of Foster's songs, numerous lyrics variants exist. cmadler (talk) 12:48, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]