User talk:Casternumber9

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. FisherQueen 22:24, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not recreate Jeremy hewitt or make other articles which disparage its subject or you will be blocked from further editing. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 22:42, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. ZimZalaBim (talk) 22:47, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahem.[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Casternumber9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So-called "attack" page is nothing of the sort, and is used only as a catch-all-- I invite you to speak directly with me concerning the article

Decline reason:

Sorry, that's clearly a nonsense attack page. The block is completely justified. Take ZimZalaBim's good advise and learn how to contribute instead of vandalizing. Gwernol 01:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will let other admin's review your request for unblock, but the article you created disparaged its subject, and was deleted according to policy. You continued to re-create it, despite warnings. When the page was protected you pasted the same disruptive content on the article's talk page. Perhaps you can use the time during your block read up on how to contribute to Wikipedia in a constructive manner. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 23:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attack warning[edit]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Gwernol 23:05, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks? No, a personal attack would be me calling you a Wikipedophile fag. Really, you'd think I was jealous or something, but really, I'm just so happy with my life, I had to even it out by making a disparaging page about myself. I had to even things out. TAKE ME BACK ;_;--71.81.16.98 (talk) 03:14, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]