User talk:Caribbeandelight
Feel free to communicate with me about anything!
Talk[edit]
- I removed your latest comments at WP:ANEW again. You reverted my first removal. You are being disruptive. This is your only warning. If you persist, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:17, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- Hello Bbb23, it seems I have reverted some of your content. I sincerely apologize for this mistake. I honestly didn't even notice it. Could you please refer to the exact content I reverted? It won't happen again certainly, don't worry.
- Thanks a lot for your warning! I reaction to my question would be even more appreciated!! Caribbeandelight (talk) 16:19, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- My bad, it seems you have removed my content from my own report! How can I add this message to my own report and not be dispruptive? I don't want to receive my first block ever over such a trivial thing. Please tell me how I can improve this message and include it in the report. Caribbeandelight (talk) 16:23, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) You didn't revert my content. You added content and I reverted your addition, and then you re-added it. I reverted a second time here. I don't want to see you editing the report at ANEW again. I don't want to see you pursuing your agenda regarding Kerma Culture. You claim to be a new user. Find constructive ways to edit this project or go away.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:26, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- I don't understand what is going on at all here. What agenda are you refering to? I have only stated that my ancestors originate from this region. I haven't made any edits to avoid possibly having a biased opinion! You are not responding to my question as to why you concluded your review with 'stale' and you completely censor me from responding to questions/concerns raised by users in 'my own report. I find this strange, but I have no reason to object. Clearly there's a lack in will having bad behavior looked into.
- I have indefinitely blocked you for a combination of disruptive editing and WP:NOTHERE. See WP:GAB for your appeal rights.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:44, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite Block[edit]
The report I filed and the content that lead to my block can be found in this link (User: Khruner 3RR violation):
Caribbeandelight (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have been indefinitely blocked for responding (in a report I filed) to comments that were made against me and had put my good character into question distracting from the report at hand. I don't believe my reaction was in violation of the community rules. If they were, surely an indefinite block isn't justified? I did react in spite of the warning, because I felt like I was being censored from clarifying relevant matters. As it is now I can't explain for example how without a doubt the 3RR rule was broken by the reported user: Khruner. But to be honest this is definitely not something I want to get involved in any further, it's intimidating and punitive to do so.
Decline reason:
Starting a report does not bestow upon you any special privileges with respect to said report. Repeatedly ignoring the instructions of the closing admin was the wrong call. Until you address any of that with a modicum of introspection, the likelihood for your unblock request being granted remains low. El_C 18:43, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I won't decline the unblock request; it is not a bad idea to have another admin look at this. But Bbb is absolutely correct: this user is disruptive, and is only here to cause trouble. Who else would come and with their first edits stir up an old, crusty shit pot (this one: User talk:Arcanery), and then pick a fight when they don't get their way? Drmies (talk) 17:11, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for sharing your concerns again Drmies. I see you are personally involved in this matter as you reviewed the case of user: khruner whom is the subject of my report, so I understand you wouldn't also want to get blocked for reviewing this case, don't worry. I understand that starting of with a report might come off as weird, but I am a member who wants to do a lot of good for wiki, but I am first learning how it all works exactly before I start making changes. As I study the rules (still am), while reading into a topic about my ancestors, I stumbled upon a clear breach of them and made a report. That's all there is to this. Caribbeandelight (talk) 17:19, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Caribbeandelight (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
You are very right. However I would like to add that I didn't repeatedly ignore instructions. I dismissed one instruction (first ever) and that was without a doubt wrong of me as this person was a special administrator which I didnt realize. I was wrong for ignoring this administrator's instruction; answering questions/concerns that were raised on my report and related to me and I apologize for any disruption this may have caused. If I realized additional clarification is considered disruptive, I would've just made one message that explains everything more detailed from the start. In the future I will refuse to engage in discussions if anything is asked to me or if I am being insulted or falsely accused of violating rules for owning multiple accounts. I wasn't aware interacting in the report would be in violation of the rules, but I will re-read the guidelines and there is no need for anyone to worry this will happen again, I promise that. I also fully accept a punishment for not following up an administrator's instruction and I will never do so again either (nor report anyone, or get in any way involved in other people/sensitive disputes), but please don't exclude me for a life-time over this incident.
Decline reason:
To the reasons for being blocked, you may add abusing mutiple accounts if you like. In view of the time you have wasted for administrators with your posts on more than one talk page concerning your blocks, I think I'll remove access to this one now. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 12:58, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I am so sorry for causing any disprution. I thought I would be doing something good for this community by reporting someone who violated a rule I read upon, but it seems I have caused more damage than any improvement. I can't edit anything anymore, but I would like to retract my report as it has lead to a disruption and me ironically being blocked instead. Please if decline again tell me what I can do to better my understanding of the rules and how I can be accepted in this community if it is not already too late. Caribbeandelight (talk) 22:38, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- Would also like to clarify that I do not believe user: Khruner should be blocked for his mistake. I thought the report would result in a warning for him not to stray off the path of good. Caribbeandelight (talk) 04:29, 13 January 2020 (UTC)