User talk:Cara22

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


We do not put either ethnicity or religion in the opening sentence of a biography, see WP:OPENPARA. Thank you. Yworo (talk) 17:02, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually we do. gaming the system does not obviously count;)

No, we don't. To quote the policy "Ethnicity or sexuality should not generally be emphasized in the opening unless it is relevant to the subject's notability. Similarly, previous nationalities or the country of birth should not be mentioned in the opening sentence unless they are relevant to the subject's notability." Anywhere you have seen this usage, whether it be Jewish-American, German-American, Italian-American, etc., is incorrect and should be removed. Yworo (talk) 06:17, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Yworo. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Andrew Stein, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yworo (talk) 06:17, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at New World Order (conspiracy theory), you may be blocked from editing. Dougweller (talk) 07:01, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Persecution of Christians in the New Testament[edit]

Don't blank this again please. If you really are challenging the source, do it at WP:RSN. Dougweller (talk) 07:05, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you have evidence there is source material is RS, then you are doing vandalism. dont do vandalism again thank you

If I have evidence that the material is reliably sourced I'm a vandal? Let me be clear, you are within a hairsbreadth of being blocked by me, particularly after your vandalism at New World Order (conspiracy theory. Dougweller (talk) 07:34, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"not" obviously,. Present and argue why your source is RS. Let me be clear, YOU are within a hairsbreadth of being reported to the admins for vandalism and WP:CIVIL.


Go right ahead, but you might not have understood that I was warning you that I would block you myself if you continue edits such as your NWO one. Dougweller (talk) 10:24, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then I am glad you admit you understood they will block you if you continue such edits as your on the NWO one unless reason for RS is argued for