User talk:Cantsayhellotoyou
Cantsayhellotoyou, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi Cantsayhellotoyou! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 23 June 2021 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for June 27[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
June 2021[edit]
Hello, I'm Bovineboy2008. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Killing the Traitor, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 14:37, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 21[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hootan Shakiba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iranian.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 10[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Parting (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Plot summaries[edit]
Please note that we cannot copy-paste plot summaries from other websites, as you did at Midday_Adventures:_Trace_of_Blood. Plots should be written in original language. BOVINEBOY2008 01:20, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright[edit]
Hello Cantsayhellotoyou! Your additions to Track 143 have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 17:25, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
September 2021[edit]
Your edit to The Lost Strait has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. DanCherek (talk) 02:11, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
October 2021[edit]
Hello Cantsayhellotoyou. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Vahid Rahbani, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Cantsayhellotoyou. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Cantsayhellotoyou|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DMySon (talk) 06:11, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
hello, I'm not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits. Cantsayhellotoyou (talk) 06:26, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Vahid Rahbani[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Vahid Rahbani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jiggyziz 🇮🇳Any Help🇮🇳? Contact Me. 09:58, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, Cantsayhellotoyou
Thank you for creating Shishlik.
User:Usedtobecool, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
It seems you have truncated the plot to avoid spoilers, and deliberately ended the section mid-sentence to build intrigue. Both are against community consensus. Please write the whole plot when you write plots even if they contain spoilers, and write complete sentences when writing in the mainspace in wikivoice. Regards!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Usedtobecool}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Usedtobecool ☎️ 13:28, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
The article Vahid Rahbani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This article was deleted multiple times and recreated again, kindly see the deletion log
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Barrettmagic Talk 15:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aliasghar ghorbandokht, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Star Mississippi 01:02, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Ziba Karamali for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ziba Karamali until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Star Mississippi 01:16, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
November 2021[edit]
Your edit to TiTi has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 20:19, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Soha Niasti moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, Soha Niasti, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Behind the moors (talk) 11:05, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Blocked[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa (talk) 01:57, 30 November 2021 (UTC)I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to Wikipedia in violation of our copyright policy. You cannot resume editing until you provide a statement describing how copyright applies to Wikipedia, show that you understand our copyright policy, and make a commitment to follow it in the future.— Diannaa (talk) 01:57, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I understand how I violated copyright policy by copying text into a Wikipedia page from another source without permission. and I learned that uploading copyrighted material without authorization is wrong and I should have permission to use it and must contact the owner of the copyright of the text. I hereby commit myself to not ever violate wikipedia copyright policy again. Cantsayhellotoyou (talk) 05:13, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Cantsayhellotoyou (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Now I understand how I violated copyright policy by copying text into a Wikipedia page from another source without permission and I learned that uploading copyrighted material without authorization is wrong and I should have permission to use it and must contact the owner of the copyright of the text and I hereby commit myself to not ever violate wikipedia copyright policy againCantsayhellotoyou (talk) 07:06, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
While we have no objections to you using other sites in order to learn about copyright to answer these questions, the fact that you just lifted direct answers gives us two indications we shouldn't unblock. One is that just parroting an answer doesn't indicate you understand it, which is what we need to know. And secondly, your first answer is from the Copyright Alliance, whose content is itself copyrighted, and you've just infringed by copying their content as part of your reasoning on why you should be unblocked for copyright infringement. Nosebagbear (talk) 16:06, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. Please respond to the following questions, explaining in your own words:
- What is copyright?
- How is Wikipedia licensed?
- Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
- Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
- How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?
Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked.— Diannaa (talk) 16:04, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
1. copyright is a collection of rights that vest to someone who creates an original work of authorship like a literary work, photo, movie, song or.. copyright ownership gives the owner the exclusive right to use the work.
2. Wikipedia's text and images are co-licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL).
3. Since the database servers are located in US, Wikipedia is subject to US copyright law in this matter and may not host material which contravene US copyright law.
4. only if the copied version is made accessible with the same terms for everyone and acknowledgment of the authors of the Wikipedia article used is included.
5. by having permission to use the literary work, photo, movie, song or.. and must contact the owner of the copyright. Cantsayhellotoyou (talk) 12:29, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Your answer to the first question was copied from here, so you've violated our copyright policy in your unblock request.— Diannaa (talk) 01:32, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
1. Copyright is the exclusive right of the owner of the work or its creator. Cantsayhellotoyou (talk) 07:47, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright is a type of licence that gives the right of copying, distributing and publishing to the owner of a work. The work can take many forms for example literary and musical. This license is given so it protects the original form, from being expressed in other forms of creative work. Copyright can have some limitations in different countries. The duration of a copyright expiers after 50 to 100 years after the creator dies. Cantsayhellotoyou (talk) 05:58, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- This answer is much better and does not appear to have been copied from anywhere. Your answer as to the length of copyright protection is incorrect and a bit simplistic - the situation is very conmplicated, as you can see by this chart. But I think you understand copyright and how it applies to Wikipedia now. Note your answer to question 5 is also incomplete. By far the majority of people you might consider contacting for permission to use their work will not give permission or even bother to reply. So the best option for Wikipedians is to write text in their own words, using the source document as a source of ideas and not of text. I am unblocking your account and will monitor all your edits until I am sure you have understood our requirements. Further violations will result in you being re-blocked.— Diannaa (talk) 16:34, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Elmira Dehghani moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, Elmira Dehghani, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 15:03, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
The article Fatemeh Masoudifar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
does not have General notability and Wikipedia:Reliable sources. She has no special reputation as an actress and there are no films in which she has acted. She has not won any special award. She may become famous in the future, but not now
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Persia ☘ 09:11, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Fatemeh Masoudifar for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatemeh Masoudifar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Persia ☘ 10:33, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Navid Mahmoudi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.asiapacificscreenawards.com/apsa-academy-members/navid-mahmoudi. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 TT me 13:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
The Heroes (TV series)[edit]
Hello. Can you please Overwrite poster with Persian wikipedia article's Poster? Thanks. 89.183.34.134 (talk) 20:24, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
The article Centipede (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable film, appears to fail requirements in WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability since August 2021
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 18:55, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Centipede (film) for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centipede (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
DonaldD23 talk to me 23:28, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Motherless.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Motherless.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Thelastsnowposter.jpeg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Thelastsnowposter.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Whenthemoonwasfull.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Whenthemoonwasfull.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:47, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Middayadventurestraceofblood.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Middayadventurestraceofblood.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:47, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:23peopleposter.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:23peopleposter.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:47, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Africanvioletposter.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Africanvioletposter.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:48, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Bendingtherules.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bendingtherules.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:48, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Sevenandahalf.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sevenandahalf.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:48, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Killerspider.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Killerspider.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:48, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Drowninginholywater.jpeg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Drowninginholywater.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:48, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Drownposter.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Drownposter.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:49, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Zeroday.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Zeroday.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:49, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Amphibiousposter.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Amphibiousposter.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:49, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Walnuttreeposter.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Walnuttreeposter.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:49, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Tooman.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tooman.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:49, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Atabai.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Atabai.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:49, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Nochoiceposter.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Nochoiceposter.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:50, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Thewasteland.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Thewasteland.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:50, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Playingwithstars.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Playingwithstars.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:50, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Shishlikposter.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Shishlikposter.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:50, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Zalava.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Zalava.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:50, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Withouteverything.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Withouteverything.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:50, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Titiposter.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Titiposter.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:51, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Skinposter.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Skinposter.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:51, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Thesituationofmehdi.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Thesituationofmehdi.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:51, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Thenightguardian.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Thenightguardian.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:51, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Theloserman.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Theloserman.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:51, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Henas.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Henas.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:51, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Thetwonposter.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Thetwonposter.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:51, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:SquadofGirls.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SquadofGirls.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:52, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Killingatraitor.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Killingatraitor.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:52, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Motherless.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Motherless.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:52, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Thelastsnowposter.jpeg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Thelastsnowposter.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:52, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Soha Niasti[edit]
Hello, Cantsayhellotoyou. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Soha Niasti, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
ممنون میشم مقاله انگلیسی این فیلم را بسازید[edit]
https://fa.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AC_(%D9%81%DB%8C%D9%84%D9%85)
با این عنوان: Plunder (1985 film)
با تشکر 2001:9E8:6D1C:D000:C8B9:B216:E234:99C2 (talk) 18:58, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Nodatenosignature.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Nodatenosignature.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Khatoonposter.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Khatoonposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
May 2022[edit]
Hello, I'm Paper9oll. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 07:50, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Han So-hee, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 08:46, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Elmira Dehghani[edit]
Hello, Cantsayhellotoyou. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Elmira Dehghani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, Cantsayhellotoyou
Thank you for creating Leila's Brothers.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 02:49, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, Cantsayhellotoyou
Thank you for creating Crystal Simorgh for Best Actor.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for your work. IMO this is an edge-case regarding wp:notability and possibly should not be a separate article. But I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 16:54, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
June 2022[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Han So-hee, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 11:42, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, Cantsayhellotoyou
Thank you for creating Hadi Hejazifar.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start. I marked as reviewed. Needs more prose type content. Happy editing!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 01:17, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Zhaleh Sameti[edit]
Zhaleh Sameti 2001:9E8:6D17:8800:17:6A23:1740:E390 (talk) 13:11, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
July 2022[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lee Yoo-mi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 09:34, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, Cantsayhellotoyou
Thank you for creating Pedram Sharifi.
User:HouseBlaster, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for the translation!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|HouseBlaster}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
HouseBlastertalk 23:07, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
"Private Meeting" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Private Meeting and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 28#Private Meeting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 03:45, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Fatemeh Masoudifar, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:19, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Golshifteh Farahani[edit]
Article Golshifteh Farahani uses DMY format. So please avoid converting her birth date to MDY and removing "df" parameter from {{Birth date and age}}. --Mann Mann (talk) 04:07, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Fadaei, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 00:33, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation[edit]
Your edit to Shayda (film) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Indignant Flamingo (talk) 06:50, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Centipede (film) for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centipede (film) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
DonaldD23 talk to me 14:09, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
The article Fadaei has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not meet WP:GNG, cited sources are either primary or egregiously unreliable. Deleted on fa.wiki following this discussion, and (see here)
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 04:48, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
December 2022[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. signed, Rosguill talk 04:52, 28 December 2022 (UTC)- I've placed the prior block having reviewed your editing history and seen that you have violated copyright at least twice since you were previously unblocked for copyright infringement. I regret the timing with respect to the unrelated PROD I proposed on an article you created, and thus will honor a request made here to remove the PROD tag. signed, Rosguill talk 04:55, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Cantsayhellotoyou (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi, I'm so sorry for violating copyright policy again, I now understand how I violated the policy in the two cases of "Navid Mahmoudi" and "Shayda (film)" by adding texts from another source without permission. From now on I won't be adding any Image or text without evidence of permission from other sources into Wikipedia. Cantsayhellotoyou (talk) 01:03, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Since you already tried to demonstrate your understanding of copyright, and violated policy again, you will have to tell us why we should now believe your assurances that you won't do so again, when you said the same thing the first time. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:45, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Cantsayhellotoyou (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand your concern about me violating the copyright policy again, so I now assure you, with explanation about the two cases that I violated the copyright policy. For the "Navid Mahmoudi" case I understand that it was entirely my mistake, adding the full Biography text from another source without any evidence of permission, and after the warning I received for "Navid Mahmoudi" Wikipedia page, I never added any Biography or Information of a an individual to a Wikipedia page again. But for the "Shayda (film)" case, I wanted to add the film's Synopsis, and first I didn't know that the film Synopsis (which is a specified explanation about the film) should as well be written by Wikipedia users and not copied from other sources even with cite references, until I saw the Copyright violation talk page that I received after I added the film's Synopsis. I now fully apologize for these two cases, and I assure you that I have understand why I got the Copyright violations and how I violated the Copyright policy in these two cases so that I would never commit any mistake again.
Decline reason:
This does absolutely nothing to convince me you understand copyright, given that you previously stated explicitly that you understood copyright. In fact, it strongly convinces me you don't. And, I agree, you need to also address your inappropriate edits. Yamla (talk) 11:24, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Not to pile on, but one thing I want to be addressed before you are allowed to continue editing is what you were trying to do here and here. You moved references to after sentences that are in no way supported by the citations, which defies explanation. Nardog (talk) 06:30, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Cantsayhellotoyou (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
As of now, I've edited and translated many articles, and few of them have mistakes, because I'm not here editing to intentionally damage any Wikipedia articles. I accept that the mistakes I've made were all wrong and my good edits and translations doesn't justify them or my inappropriate edits. how can I assure you that I have understood the copyright policy and I won't violate it again?
Decline reason:
I am going to decline this request. A block for copyright infringement is not great. A second block means that there is a severe lack of understanding of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Furthermore, copying and pasting from a source does not happen by accident; it is a deliberate decision that shows a lack of understanding of policy. I suggest that you do not edit Wikipedia for a couple months (including unblock requests) and instead read the copyright policy, ask questions below about it, and gain a better understanding of how to edit Wikipedia. Once you have fully understood the copyright policy, please post an explanation of the policy below in your own words, describe how your edits violated this policy, and how you will change your editing habits to ensure that this never happens again. If there are other edits you have performed that might cause concern (like the links Nardog posted above) please post about them below and another editor will evaluate them. Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Z1720 (talk) 17:35, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hi, I have a question regarding adding film Synopsis —which is a specified explanation about the film— into Wikipedia articles. How should we add a film synopsis to Wikipedia without violating the copyright policy? Should Wikipedia users rewrite the film Synopsis with their own words? (Since I've got one of my copyright violations for adding film Synopsis to "Shayda (film)" article.) I would appreciate it if you explain this matter to me. @Z1720: Cantsayhellotoyou (talk) 01:44, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- You're blocked, indefinitely. You can use this talk page to communicate with administrators regarding that block. You've been here since June 2021, meaning you had a year and a half to ask these questions, and to write content without violating our copyright policies. Why any of us should spend time and explain a matter that first of all is not difficult (all you have to do is not steal other people's writing) and second is irrelevant (since you are blocked) is not clear to me. Drmies (talk) 01:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, yes I'm aware that I've been blocked indefinitely, the other users have already explain it to me and one of them (Z1720) have told me to read and ask questions about the copyright policy, and pinning them if needed. You are right, I've been here since June 2021, but i got the copyright violation warning for adding a "film synopsis" in November 2022, so that's why im asking a question regarding adding a film synopsis. I've been checking my copyright violations and reading the copyright policy so that i can fully understand what i wrongfully did. so sorry for bothering you and your time. I understand it's my mistake and i shouldn't waste you and the other people's time. thank you for your reply on this matter. @Drmies: Cantsayhellotoyou (talk) 02:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- I guess I just don't understand why it would be hard to write something by yourself? It's really simple: you can't use other people's words. There's some leeway there, but if you've been found to engage in copyright violations, then the answer is rather obvious, it seems to me: not a single word or phrase can come from someone else. That's good practice. Drmies (talk) 02:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, yes I'm aware that I've been blocked indefinitely, the other users have already explain it to me and one of them (Z1720) have told me to read and ask questions about the copyright policy, and pinning them if needed. You are right, I've been here since June 2021, but i got the copyright violation warning for adding a "film synopsis" in November 2022, so that's why im asking a question regarding adding a film synopsis. I've been checking my copyright violations and reading the copyright policy so that i can fully understand what i wrongfully did. so sorry for bothering you and your time. I understand it's my mistake and i shouldn't waste you and the other people's time. thank you for your reply on this matter. @Drmies: Cantsayhellotoyou (talk) 02:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- To reiterate what Drmies says above, the Synopsis in an article cannot be copied and pasted from another place, including fan websites, author synopsis on a publisher's website, or descriptions from critics. Instead, whoever adds the information to Wikipedia needs to write their own summary of the work. MOS:PLOT gives guidelines on how to do this. For referencing, most times the Synopsis does not need to be cited as it is assumed that the information is coming from the work of fiction, as descripted in MOS:PLOTSOURCE. Keep in mind that your first task is probably to be unblocked, so please focus on that before proposing changes. Z1720 (talk) 19:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Behrad Tavakoli moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, Behrad Tavakoli, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:46, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Maryam Momen for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maryam Momen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
NameGame (talk) 12:50, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Behrad Tavakoli[edit]
Hello, Cantsayhellotoyou. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Behrad Tavakoli, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 1 June 2023 (UTC)