User talk:Banjalucki velikan

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Borac Banja Luka, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Darkness Shines (talk) 17:58, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Borac Banja Luka[edit]

Sve slike koje si u bacio ce biti izgleda skinute, lel si izgleda pogresnu licencu stavio ili nesto drugo. Poksuaj da spasis slike. Slike su pod diskusiom. Podzrav--Nado158 (talk) 15:57, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Koje slike su tvoje? Which images are yours? --WhiteWriter^speaks 16:12, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tu ti ne mogu trenutnp pomoci. Idi na stranu tih slike i vidi sta im smeta i sta traze od tebe. Inace, bolje vise ubaci neki tekst, jel imamo previse slika na kratak clanak(treba neka ravnoteza da se drzi, inace su slike super itd.). I pazi na formatiranje i ako ubacujes clanak, ubazuj nesto pozitivno, interesatno nista drugo, jel ovde se negativno odma iskoriscava za propagandu ako razumes, i kako si vec primetio.Pozdrav--Nado158 (talk) 09:02, 2 July 2012 (UTC) Wikipedija je enceklopediska strana, zanci strana koja daje informacije itd. Znaci galerija bi bila dozvoljena ali u granicama, nesme da bude naduvano, previse slika idt. Nikako nebi izgledalo dobro i profesionalno da ima tolko slika a kratak clanak ako me razumes. Zato cu probati i dalje da pisem o Lesinarima kad budem imo vremena. I ja sam bio napisao nekoliko clanaka, stavio dobroe slike i posle kratkog vremena sve slike su mi obrisali(tako kod Vose,CZ idt), pa sam morao staviti slika koje su vec prosle tu njihovu kontrolu koju ne kontam, i ako nisam bas zadovoljan sa tim slikama. Ja sam takodje napisao izvore i autore koje sam znao itd. Rekli su mi da sam stavio pogresnu licencu itd? Nazalost nisam upicen tolko u to. Pokusavaj nekako da spasis, jel sve slike koje si stavio su ti obelezene da budu obrisane. Pitaj WhiteWriter, modza ce ti pomoci? U vezi Semi-p. , jos nisam sigruan kako, moram da stavim CZ i Vosu, i odma kad zaznajem stavicu i BBL. Pomazem kolko mogu brate. --Nado158 (talk) 14:32, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nazalost, brisu tu polako slike :(--Nado158 (talk) 15:05, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jel si piato onog drugog za pomoc?--Nado158 (talk) 16:13, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username (Borac Banja Luka) may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it looks like it represents the association football team FK Borac Banja Luka.. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{WrestleMania XXVIII} _{The Undertaker 20–0} 16:40, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It`s common username on our forums and there are several versions of writing it such as Borac Banja Luka, Borac BL, Banja Lucki Borac etc so I think it`s not inappropriate.

Regards --Borac Banja Luka (talk) 17:31, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for editing. To add to the username issue: it is, however, the name of a club, correct? On the English Wikipedia, we have a policy that does not allow usernames that are shared by multiple people, or to even look like they are shared by multiple people. Further, usernames in the form of a club are considered promotional, on a neutral encyclopedia. These rules are different than those on other websites and are treated seriously. Would you be willing to change your username as soon as possible? I recommend requesting a simple rename. NTox · talk 18:57, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of TK Borac[edit]

The article TK Borac has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and no indication of WP:notability. Staging exhibition matches does not make them notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 14:44, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of AK Borac[edit]

The article AK Borac has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced and not indication of WP:notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 14:55, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Slobodan Starčević[edit]

The article Slobodan Starčević has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Kurepalaku (talk) 13:16, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]