User talk:BluePankow

BluePankow, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi BluePankow! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Testing my Signature[edit]

BluePankow 16:45, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BluePankow 16:50, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BluePankow ✉ 12:04, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BluePankow ✉ 12:05, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BluePankow ✉

BluePankow ✉ 12:09, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kenwood TS-820S has been accepted[edit]

Kenwood TS-820S, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 19:43, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Am Aschenberg, Germany[edit]

Hi, I'm Pkbwcgs. BluePankow, thanks for creating Am Aschenberg, Germany!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add some categories to this page and link from other pages to this page in order to de-orphan this. However, this is a good start to what will be an interesting article about a German City.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:35, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Will make some improvements on the article. Thanks for the tips! BluePankow ✉ 09:42, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kenwood TS-820S copyedit[edit]

Hello, BluePankow. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Kenwood TS-820S at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Nice article. All the best, Miniapolis 00:29, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the copy-edit! I appreciate it. BluePankow ✉ 14:46, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Lithops otzeniana) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Lithops otzeniana.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Very interesting, it looks very unique.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boothsift}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

The One and Only Boothsift 23:09, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Boothsift: Thanks very much! I've been trying to cover every nonexistent Lithops species article mentioned on the Lithops page. Wish me luck! BluePankow ✉ 23:12, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Lithops julii) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Lithops julii.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Great start!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Stevey7788}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— Stevey7788 (talk) 23:44, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Taxonomy categories[edit]

Thank you for the toast sandwich. You've been doing good work creating Lithops articles. However, you shouldn't be placing articles in both Category:Lithops and Category:Aizoaceae. As Lithops is already a subcategory of Aizoaceae, it's is redundant to include the Aizoaceae category. Taxa should only be placed in one taxonomy category, and that category should be for the lowest taxonomic rank for which a category exists (if you ever find yourself creating a large number of articles on species in a genus where no genus category currently exists, feel free to create the genus category). Plantdrew (talk) 18:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha, thanks for the tip! BluePankow ✉ 22:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Randy's son![edit]

Thanks for the message. Sorry it took me so long. I barely remember how to do this so I'm not even sure if this is the right way to leave a user message anymore.

I hope you have a great time on this site and make some friends. I found it very rewarding while I was involved.

P.S. I know your real name of course, but I don't want to "doxx" you.

Hope to see you all soon Decumanus (talk) 17:01, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Decumanus: Good to hear from you! No worries on the time; I totally get it. Life tends to steal my Wikipedia time as well. Thanks for not doxxing me haha. I haven't made too many friends yet. None at all actually. The community is not as fun as it used to be I don't think, and people are pretty cold and business-like. I suppose that makes sense, but I still haven't found anybody that's not like either a stuck up admin or just a not very inviting person. Then again, I haven't really put in the effort to get myself out there besides on edits either. Hope to see you soon too! Have a good one. BluePankow ✉ 16:04, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bartheletiomycetes moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Bartheletiomycetes, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 94rain ^Talk 01:37, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Psilocybe kurac for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Psilocybe kurac is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psilocybe kurac until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. William Avery (talk) 11:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable references for common names[edit]

Hi! Just wanted to drop a quick note that because anyone with an account can add common names to species/taxa on iNaturalist, it's not considered a reliable source for inclusion on Wikipedia. I replaced the reference at Andreaea rothii for "dusty rock moss" with one from NatureServe for "dusky rock moss". —Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 18:52, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HyperikThank you! I won't add that as a source again. I appreciate the information. BluePankow ✉ 16:13, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiDodo[edit]

		The Fauna Barnstar
		My fellow dodo, so glad to see my brothers & sisters are still alive! Stay strong :). --BestOnLifeform (talk) 01:45, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BestOnLifeform Gratias tibi ago. BluePankow ✉ 04:09, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidodo[edit]

		The Fauna Barnstar
		Hello my fellow wikidodo. You are not alone. TigerScientist (talk) 22:58, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@TigerScientist: Thank you brother, we shall stay strong together! BluePankow ✉ 02:35, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]