User talk:Blood 6.3

Red bloods[edit]

I have Hurd if you are a red blood you are a blood for life is that true.

   Yes or no Blood 6.3 (talk) 13:51, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I thank so fair from my experience that it is true Blood 6.3 (talk) 14:21, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Any one who wants to comment or text me back on what you thaink about it just commit

Blood 6.3 (talk) 14:33, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have to go know I will text back tomorrow at 2:40 pm ok thanks bye Blood 6.3 (talk) 15:13, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Blood 6.3 (talk) 14:26, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Right Blood 6.3 (talk) 14:26, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blood[edit]

Red bloods Blood 6.3 (talk) 15:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

Your recent test edits to Talk:Bloods & Crips was disruptive, vandalism and reverted. Entry of false information is not helpful. If you want to experiment or make a test edit, please use the sandbox. These pages are patrolled by robots and human editors like me. When you make an edit please leave an accurate edit summary, and not a misleading one. You can be blocked for this. Further vandalism will get you blocked from editing without further notice. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:55, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]