User talk:Beachey23

Beachey23, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Beachey23! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:04, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Me & the Rhythm

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Me & the Rhythm you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 23:02, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Me & the Rhythm

The article Me & the Rhythm you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Me & the Rhythm for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 18:41, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Me & the Rhythm

Regarding this edit, [1], next time let the robot do that.

Cheers, MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 17:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

0h, thanks. And tell me if you need me for any reviews.--Beachey23 (talk) 17:54, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Me & the Rhythm

The article Me & the Rhythm you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Me & the Rhythm for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 18:02, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Congrats! I credit you for the good article promotion here. If there are any other articles on this list that you are interested in promoting, by all means, please do! Keep up the great work. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:04, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you so much. I definitely will.--Beachey23 (talk) 19:36, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

File:My-Old-Man-Cover-Art.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:My-Old-Man-Cover-Art.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 18:35, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

I am okay with the deletion of aforementioned file.--Beachey23 (talk) 01:57, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beachey23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I want to do the right thing I swear. Blocks are preventative, not punitive right? Well, my argument is that keeping me blocked is not preventing any damage to Wikipedia. I was blocked so quickly but no one noted the drastic improvements I made to so many articles 1 2 and 3. I only mean well to the encyclopedia. Admins have kept telling me, make an unblock request after a year. Well, there you have it, aren't you making it punitive? The truth is that the only other sock that this started with is User:MaranoBoy and I only intended it as a safety net in case I went on a robot-enforced wikibreak because of my Bipolar disorder again. Why did Wikipedia blacklist me because of this. I have realized my mistakes and wont repeat them again. I just want to improve these piss-poor articles. I have taken complete responsibility for my actions and realized my mistake but no one reciprocates. Here is what I propose, I want to be unblocked on a 'twenty day trial period'. I want to be observed closely by admins for any disruptive behaviour. And just let me (a constructive contributor who has a mental illness) make a return. I will happily take the block and never return again if admins determine that I am bad for the 'pedia, but that wont happen. I am just another editor. I do feel like the original blocking admin Bbb23 blocked me out of spite, see [2]. I admitted that I had a mental illness, he asked me to talk about it [3]. After I declined, he tried to force it out of me. But just because the admin blocked me out of spite doesn't mean that I haven't learned my lesson though.

Decline reason:

 Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:13, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pointless canvassing
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
I just want the following users to give some input: Jaguar, Floquenbeam, Bbb23, Another Believer, IndianBio, and Lips Are Movin. I was hounded by users like Winkelvi, and it made my mental illness thousand times worse.--Beachey23 (talk) 12:57, 19 June 2017 (UTC) EDIT: Also, adding, Bbb23 is also the admin who blocked me now. I am not implying that this is due to hate, but just noting.--Beachey23 (talk) 13:02, 19 June 2017 (UTC) Also, I am fine with taking a voluntary IBAN from Winkelvi, which I will regardless of if I'm unblocked or not. Also see how CookieMonster755 and countless other editors were given a second chance. Why WASNT I despite my mental illness? --Beachey23 (talk) 13:11, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

File:My-Old-Man-Cover-Art.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:My-Old-Man-Cover-Art.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 26 June 2017 (UTC)