User talk:Bajsikus

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Bajsikus, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:00, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Bajsikus. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Stefano Černetić, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. BuySomeApples (talk) 18:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Bajsikus, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:00, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm DreamRimmer. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Stefano Černetić—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. – DreamRimmer (talk) 11:26, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please help me to delete this page. I made it, but there are a lot of references that are not accurate and reliable and we are doing harm to the person and reputation Bajsikus (talk) 12:58, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been told already that G7 speedy deletion does not apply, so please do not request that anymore.

Your PROD has been challenged, and the article has been taken to AfD, where you are welcome to present your arguments. The AfD discussion is likely to run for one week or longer.

BTW, what is your relationship with Stefano Černetić? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:38, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stefano Černetić. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, it won't happen again. ~~~Bajsikus Bajsikus (talk) 07:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stefano Černetić for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stefano Černetić is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefano Černetić until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Elemimele (talk) 13:34, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. ok just nominate it to be deleted. thank you Bajsikus (talk) 14:20, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bajsikus,

You can only cast ONE "vote" at a deletion discussion and you bolded FOUR. Please stop and calm down. No more ALLCAPS sentences. It makes other editors not take your remarks seriously. You can continue to comment if you wish but no more bolded votes. Also, please always put your signature (using "~~~~") after any talk page or discussion comments you make on the project. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:32, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking[edit]

Please stop blanking Stefano Černetić. If you continue to blank it, you will be blocked for disruptive editing. You need to let the AFD run. That discussion will decide the fate of the article. Blanking will accomplish one thing, getting you blocked from editing. ~ GB fan 14:13, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. ok just nominate it to be deleted. thank you Bajsikus (talk) 14:20, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is nominated for deletion, you can discuss the deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefano Černetić. ~ GB fan 14:22, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest? Your response is required.[edit]

Yesterday you were alerted to the need to declare if you had a CONFLICT OF INTEREST with the page you created on Stefano Černetić. Your somewhat desperate attempts to subseqently have that page deleted see here, here and here seems most suspicious to me.

So, as an administrator here, I now need to ask you to declare if you are connected with the subject in any way, or if have been WP:PAID to create and edit it? Undeclared paid editing is against our policies, and any editor will be blocked from editing if they fail to declare such connections, and who is paying them.

Please do not make further edits on this subject (including at WP:AFD) until such time as you have indicated below, one way or another, whether you have such a connection to the subject. Thank you. Nick Moyes (talk) 23:51, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear administrator, I apologize for the mistakes I make and if I disturb others.

This is my first article and I'm still learning how to do it.

I am not paid, and I follow the life events of Stefano Černetić, about whom the article was written.

The text I wrote is part of the hope that I will be able to show that the texts written in the news and tabloids are fabrications and that an innocent person is being persecuted and condemned. That's why I always focus on history and the Court in the article. Unfortunately, there are still no serious books and literature about all those events, and the editors unfortunately rely on the unverified references of journalists.

I thought that Wikipedia would be able to correct the mistake and damage that was caused to this person, that's why I wrote the article, but unfortunately with a lot of editing of the original text, it was changed from the root and unfortunately a lot of editors rely on newspaper articles that they copied from each other. I only had good intentions, and I didn't mean for something like this to happen, and I'm very sorry. That's why I urge you to delete the article so that unverified information does not spread further. Bajsikus (talk) 07:43, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, can you please not urge everyone you come across to delete the article. It is now in active deletion discussion, which will take a week, as mentioned several times already.

Secondly, you also don't need to take every opportunity to advocate for this person. In this instance, you were simply asked to state your connection with him.

...which you didn't really do. You said you are not paid to write this article. Fine. "Follow the life events" doesn't really tell us anything.

So one more time, for absolute clarity: how would you describe your relationship with Černetić? Please comment on this matter only. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir, I apologize again, I don't know the rules of Wikipedia and that's why I made mistakes. I panicked. The ancestors of Stefano Černetić (Čarnojević, Csarnojevity... In many languages, they are spelled and given different names) once lived in the country where I live. The northern part of today's Serbia, which is called Vojvodina, is very historically important for his family. Because of great admiration for his ancestors, I also follow his life. I knew he had been portrayed negatively many years ago and I thought I could make things right as an individual. I was wrong and for that I am very sorry. I made a mistake because I wanted to write an article without experience and now everything is bad. even this article on wikipedia has turned into a bad tabloid. I apologize. Bajsikus (talk) 08:41, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sandstein 13:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]