User talk:Badguy1234

Hello, I come from a parallel Universe from yours. I am just visiting your solar system for a short time (too bad).I like it here. In my universe, bad mean good and good mean bad, and everything is not like yours. I am studying about the Neutrino to prove that the General Theory of Relativity of Albert Einstein was wrong. I like to edit pages because it is fun. I like to delete pages to so I named myself Bad guy. This is the Video of my work in serching for neutrino!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgY6du5cwTA

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	That's a good video! Coolguy6662 (talk) 06:49, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The No Spam Barnstar
	I learned lots of things from that video. Thank you!! Devapath (talk) 07:03, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you![edit]

I know that you are lying when you said that you are from another Universe. But the video you provide is good! Eliot1102 (talk) 07:07, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

I disagree with you whether he was lying or not because there is a theory about parallel Universe, but I DO agree that the video is good

Spectre1102 (talk) 07:09, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Special Barnstar
	I didn't know that Einstein was wrong until I watch that video. But the problem is I don't know that if there is something faster than light ( just like in the video said ), so why was Einstein wrong? Bully1043 (talk) 07:17, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you![edit]

Because his General Theory of Relativity shown that nothing was faster than the light. Spectre1102 (talk) 07:19, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Acceleration, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Acceleration was changed by Badguy1234 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.902203 on 2012-03-05T03:48:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:48, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at War. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: War was changed by Badguy1234 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916413 on 2012-03-05T03:55:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:55, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to War with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 03:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Princeton University, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Princeton University was changed by Badguy1234 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.92993 on 2012-03-05T03:57:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:58, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 04:01, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Badguy1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Administrators, I am the person who is in charge for all the changing, not Coolguy6662, and that is my cousin. So please unlock him for editing

Decline reason:

Please refer to your own block here. — foxj 08:47, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.