User talk:BDPI

August 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Osarius. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to David Visentin have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Os ari us 15:15, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, BDPI. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page David Visentin, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:49, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not constructive[edit]

Hyperlinks are not allowed in Wikipedia articles. First time, your unreferenced addition was reverted. Both time, you deleted referenced content and added unreferenced content. Verification via refs is always required. Wording such as "It’s not just ‘TV Charm’ that sets David apart. His industry experience, personality and straightforward approach have made him a local and international success." is not neutral point of view and could be used only if it was a quote from a reliable source reference. David notMD (talk) 17:21, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]