User talk:Aswin.Shrestha

Welcome![edit]

Hi Aswin.Shrestha! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:21, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Aswin.Shrestha. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:22, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Mostly unreferenced. And the items listed under 'References' are not references but external links as they haven't been cited. Please see WP:REFB for advice on referencing; the preferred method is by inline citations, see WP:ILC.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Aswin.Shrestha/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:24, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aswin.Shrestha! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:24, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is still unreferenced content, eg. the entire 'Philanthropy' section hasn't a single cite. Also, the tone and style is unencyclopaedic, with expressions like "Finally settling in the textile industry, the journey of Golyan started in Nepal".

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Aswin.Shrestha/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:50, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Aswin.Shrestha/sandbox[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Aswin.Shrestha/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CNMall41 (talk) 08:53, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Aswin.Shrestha, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Aswin.Shrestha|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:58, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:53, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jimfbleak,

My apologizes for any mistakes I have made. Obviously, I'm new and I guess I was naïve on what to do.

Firstly. Aswin.Shrestha is not connected with any company, website or any kind of service whatsoever, it is my real name. I had no idea that it was not allowed and I had to create a mysterious name (username). Additionally, I'm not being paid for any edits I have been doing. But I agree my writings might not have been as per the requirement.

So, I would be grateful and honored if the community can help me learn the way Wikipedia works.

My sincere apologizes.

Warm regards,

A.S. Aswin.Shrestha (talk) 03:59, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jimfbleak,

My apologizes for any mistakes I have made. Obviously, I'm new and I guess I was naïve on what to do.

Firstly. Aswin.Shrestha is not connected with any company, website or any kind of service whatsoever, it is my real name. I had no idea that it was not allowed and I had to create a mysterious name (username). Additionally, I'm not being paid for any edits I have been doing. But I agree my writings might not have been as per the requirement.

So, I would be grateful and honored if the community can help me learn the way Wikipedia works.

My sincere apologizes.

Warm regards,

A.S.

Aswin.Shrestha (talk) 04:15, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You were given advice above on January 3, 2023 but failed to heed it. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:18, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I thought it was more about the citation and sources. So, I tried to update it and share it with them.

I don't know where I went wrong. Aswin.Shrestha (talk) 06:22, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I don't know where you went wrong by not reading the big heading that says "Managing a Conflict of Interest" with bolded instructions on how to deal with it. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:41, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]