User talk:Aseleste/Archives/Talk/2021/04

Archive index

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ever Given

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

So this is happening. If you can possibly do such a task, towards the end of April Fools could you make it so it's "been freed" (like, make a loop where it moves right off the page and then re-enters from the left and it repeats)? It'd make a good resolution. Panini^📚 13:57, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

@Panini!: While I don't think I can make the edit myself (sleeping), I have prepared the changes needed to do what you said. To implement those changes:

1. Replace "Style.css" with "Style freed.css"
2. Replace "300s" (300 seconds) with a shorter appropriate time like "10s" (10 seconds)

If you then preview the page, the ship should move like how you want it to. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 14:30, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Aseleste, Wow, much appreciated! Panini^📚 14:44, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

@Panini!: I have made an edit to demonstrate how it should look like. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 14:47, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Aseleste, Looks good, I'll make the change in the last hour or so. Panini^📚 14:48, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Aseleste, I hope I'm not a bother, but could you also create a code that makes the background change from white to red like an alarm? I tried to figure it out myself but I'm no good with coding... Panini^📚 14:56, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

@Panini!: Can you describe it in more detail? ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 14:58, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Aseleste, Okay, so the article appears to have a white background, but after about 4 seconds it turns red for about 1 second and turns back to white (and then loops this) as if it's a blinking red alarm. I plan on making Ever Green violently spin at high speeds and the excavators are freaking out about it. I'm telling a story kinda. Panini^📚 15:01, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Doing... ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 15:13, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

@Panini!:  Done - See Special:Diff/1015452651. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 15:38, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Aseleste, Looks great. Thank you! Panini^📚 15:39, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A barnstar for you!

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2021! I hope you have a good rest of the year. Nrco0e (talk · contribs) 00:48, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! Now just need to cleanup... ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 01:05, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

April Fool AfDs

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

May I ask why did you remove my Soroka and Robinhood joke AfDs? The Donald Trump (2nd nomination) listing is directly made on the page itself and still stands, so that must have been a proper way of participation. Second, a few IP addresses has successfully made joke requests, like that on the Milky Way, so IP address must have been permitted, too. Also, the subjects of my two joke requests should not be that controversial. Thank you! --2001:569:7B92:5500:B02B:997B:1CF9:16F5 (talk) 02:29, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Resolved - Special:Diff/1015546006/1015547005 ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 04:24, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Page mover granted

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hello, Aseleste. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

• Wikipedia:Requested moves
• Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Anarchyte (talk • work) 14:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Talk:SpaceX/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hello, Aseleste,

Just a reminder that every time you tag a page for deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/TFD/CFD/etc.), you need to post a notice on the talk page of the page creator so they are aware of what has happened to the pages they have created. If you use Twinkle and set up your Preferences to "Notify page creator if possible", the program will notify the editor for you whenever you tag a page so I encourage editors to make use of it. Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:28, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Ita140188 did the tagging, so pinging them to read the message: Ita140188. I have only added <noinclude/>. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 02:50, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
806		Danone (talk)	Add sources
72		Ai Ogura (talk)	Add sources
93		Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation (talk)	Add sources
43		TV Today Network (talk)	Add sources
335		Biocon (talk)	Add sources
337		CG Power and Industrial Solutions (talk)	Add sources
35		Filip Salač (talk)	Cleanup
992		TCL Technology (talk)	Cleanup
155		Motorized scooter (talk)	Cleanup
251		Jaume Masiá (talk)	Expand
752		Joint venture (talk)	Expand
99		ING Vysya Bank (talk)	Expand
160		Oracle Financial Services Software (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
155		Oberoi Realty (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
170		Electric truck (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
805		Future Group (talk)	Merge
619		Nikola Corporation (talk)	Merge
92		Acronyms and abbreviations in avionics (talk)	Merge
34		Sustainable biofuel (talk)	Wikify
22		Government Medical College, Patiala (talk)	Wikify
14		National Unified USSD Platform (talk)	Wikify
24		Reshma Patel (talk)	Orphan
4		Ali Ahmed Fazeel (talk)	Orphan
2		Musawir Munir (talk)	Orphan
364		Shriram Group (talk)	Stub
36		Carlos Tatay (talk)	Stub
66		Godrej Agrovet (talk)	Stub
75		Godrej Properties Limited (talk)	Stub
110		Stefano Manzi (talk)	Stub
80		Godrej Industries Ltd (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:35, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Testing

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Testing... ~ Aseleste ( | t, e | c, l) 07:31, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Test again... ~ Aseleste ( | t, e | c, l) 07:32, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Draft talk:Benjamin Kapelushnik

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

• Draft talk:Benjamin Kapelushnik

Hey, thank you for your efforts to improve rcat tagging. However, please not that you mistagged that page by placing {{R from draft}} and {{R to main namespace}} on the page. Since it's a draft talk page, it isn't considered a draft page nor does it lead to a page in mainspace (it leads to talkspace). –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 17:30, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

@MJL: I think tagging talk pages are allowed since they do not get added to Category:Pages with templates in the wrong namespace. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 02:24, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

[Thank you for the ping] I'll look into getting that fixed. If you read the template documentation, it says what the rcat is intended for. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 04:07, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"User:Aseleste/Category holder" listed at Redirects for discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect User:Aseleste/Category holder. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 6#User:Aseleste/Category holder until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Guy Macon (talk) 18:34, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:San Francisco in popular culture has been nominated for merging

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Category:San Francisco in popular culture has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:03, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

HK company edit requests

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hi Aseleste, hope all goes well! You kindly fielded some COI edit requests in February for Jardine Matheson - if it catches your fancy, a new batch of minor requests (some loose ends, nothing too hairy) was posted last month. Either way, thanks again! JeanetteM2 (talk) 01:47, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Pending ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 03:54, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Doing... Alright, I should work on it today... ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 01:30, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

 Done - Special:Diff/1012005124/1017341960 ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 07:09, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A barnstar for you!

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

		The Articles for Creation Barnstar
		Well-done for your contributions in Requested Redirects! 92.237.102.75 (talk) 22:34, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! A pleasant surprise indeed. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 11:03, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Move of Alsophila dealbata

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

I don't know why this was only requested as an uncontested technical move; why was there no request for a move on the talk page of the article? It would absolutely have been contested, since it would be necessary to show why it was correct under Wikipedia:Naming conventions (flora). I'm confident that I would not have been the only WP:PLANTS editor to have objected. In my view it's totally unhelpful to have the situation now at Category:Alsophila (plant), where all the species are at the scientific name except for one. A redirect at "Silver fern" ensured that the article could always be found. I think the situation as it was should be restored, and a proper discussion initiated. If it's then decided that a move is justified, fine. Peter coxhead (talk) 13:02, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

I have read Wikipedia:Naming conventions (flora) quickly beforehand and the content indicates that it has outside significance. However, I think I missed "these exceptions are determined on a case-by-case basis through discussion towards consensus", which implies that a discussion should be held.

In any case, the page has been restored. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 13:32, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! Peter coxhead (talk) 14:57, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Relist comments

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hey, this isn't a demand for you to stop or any sort of real warning, but I'd just like to drop a note to consider being more cautious with your relist comments (and to keep in mind that NAC relists are almost as controversial as NACs proper at AfD). Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thalolam (film) was not only a third relist (something that generally requires pretty unusual circumstances) but practically a !vote in its own right. Vaticidalprophet 09:29, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

I am aware that third or further relists should be avoided without good reason. While the relist comment is not intended to be a !vote, it has been amended to avoid potential misunderstanding. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 10:42, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Merge of Portuguese Pandur

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hey! Just dropping a heads up that regarding your close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portuguese Pandur, there was actually referenced content in Portuguese Pandur that was not moved to Pandur II#Portuguese variants in the edit to which you referred. I have merged (diff) the first three sentences of the lead (permalink) over to Pandur II to complete the merge. Thanks! — MarkH₂₁^talk 10:19, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Alright, thanks. Amended the closing message with Special:Diff/1017740548. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 10:37, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

• From the editor: A change is gonna come

• Disinformation report: Paid editing by a former head of state's business enterprise

• In the media: Fernando, governance, and rugby

• Opinion: The (Universal) Code of Conduct

• Op-Ed: A Little Fun Goes A Long Way

• Changing the world: The reach of protest images on Wikipedia

• Recent research: Quality of aquatic and anatomical articles

• Traffic report: The verdict is guilty, guilty, guilty

• News from Wiki Education: Encouraging professional physicists to engage in outreach on Wikipedia

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:30, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Paul Ritter

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hi - you moved Paul Ritter to Paul Ritter (architect), which means that the base page name just redirects there now, which is basically exactly the same situation as before the move. It broke the "Other uses" template on the architect page as well. Either the dab page or (looking at the discussion) the actor page needs to be moved to the base name, it can't be left as a redirect. Black Kite (talk) 11:52, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

• To explain why, imagine that I am looking for the actor and type in his name. How do I find him now? Black Kite (talk) 11:56, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

• Thanks for fixing that! Black Kite (talk) 11:58, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

@Black Kite: Hi, when you sent this message, I was still in the process of moving - specifically, I was updating the incoming links to Paul Ritter and changing them to link to Paul Ritter (architect). The move should be completed now. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 11:59, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

OK - I just saw your close of the RM and thought you were only going to move the one page. Black Kite (talk) 12:04, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"Wikipedia:Textbook" listed at Redirects for discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia:Textbook. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 19#Wikipedia:Textbook until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 19:51, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:San Francisco in popular culture has been nominated for merging

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Category:San Francisco in popular culture has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:03, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
296		Exorcism in Islam (talk)	Add sources
4		Zongga (talk)	Add sources
10		Salem University, Lokoja (talk)	Add sources
43		Usmanu Danfodiyo University (talk)	Add sources
37		Federal University Ndufu Alike Ikwo (talk)	Add sources
8		Olusola Amusan (talk)	Add sources
308		Blue–green distinction in language (talk)	Cleanup
474		Political colour (talk)	Cleanup
64		Bobby Robinson (record producer) (talk)	Cleanup
1,014		Lexus ES (talk)	Expand
996		Invasion of the Body Snatchers (talk)	Expand
67		Federal University of Petroleum Resources Effurun (talk)	Expand
32		Marigold (color) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
62		Arab League–Iran relations (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,315		Shades of blue (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
280		Islamic hygienical jurisprudence (talk)	Merge
9		Dagblad van het Noorden (talk)	Merge
76		Islamic view of miracles (talk)	Merge
102		Cosmology in medieval Islam (talk)	Wikify
30		Madonna University, Elele (talk)	Wikify
3		2015–16 Bahraini King's Cup (talk)	Wikify
7		Billboard Top Dance Hits (talk)	Orphan
2		Shihu, Jilin (talk)	Orphan
2		Sallsell (talk)	Orphan
162		Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub
29		Guelmim (talk)	Stub
39		Federal University, Gashua (talk)	Stub
4		Lopamudra Bhattacharji (talk)	Stub
95		Microsoft Academic (talk)	Stub
27		Federal University, Dutsin-Ma (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:32, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

How do I change the title of a WikiProject?

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

How do I change the title of a WikiProject? 64.121.103.144 (talk) 22:53, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Well, it is only a proposal, so there is no WikiProject yet. Do you mean changing "SpaceX (company)" to "SpaceX"?

That aside, I think you should propose creating a task force instead as outlined on Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Proposing a task force. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 06:40, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I mean taht I want to remove (company). What is a task force? 64.121.103.144 (talk) 12:52, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Removed "(company)". A task force is like a subproject of a WikiProject. Reading WP:Task force may help here. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 11:04, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Vasanthi

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hey! Do you have a source that Vasanthi (2020 film) was released in 2020? I know it has won Kerala State awards, but I know that they sometimes award films that haven't been released yet. I looked back in December and I could not find any evidence that the film was released to theatres or had a premiere or anything. BOVINEBOY2008 14:37, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

I now see you were executing a request by another editor, I will take my question to them. BOVINEBOY2008 14:51, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

On hold: Observing User talk:Adithyak1997#Vasanthi (permalink). ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 06:29, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Qatar-3

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

You recently closed an AfD discussion related to the star Qatar-3. The discussion was closed with a described result of "merge from Qatar-3b." This may be a typo since the consensus appeared to be merge *to* Qatar-3b. The talk page at Talk:Qatar-3 states that the result of the discussion was "no action". The page Qatar-3b still has the deletion header stating that the discussion was closed but the merge has not taken place. I was about to merge it, but having gone through all the pages I'm none the wiser as to what close you actually intended and whether the described result was a misreading of the discussion. Lithopsian (talk) 19:24, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

@Lithopsian: Looking over the discussion again, the merge direction seems unclear and the only thing that supports one over the other is the numbers. I think this is why the discussion was closed as merge from. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 10:50, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"closed by non-admin page mover"

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

You know now, I suspect, but you may have wanted to check the page history before you made that close :P Vaticidalprophet 07:49, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Heh. I believe you are talking about Talk:Van Zant#Requested move 16 April 2021. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 08:08, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Yep. I reverted because RM/TR isn't all that admin-patrolled; last time I closed a protected RM it took several days. I've been thinking about bringing to AN "hey, should we review indef move protections?", especially considering most were set before PMR was unbundled. Vaticidalprophet 09:28, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

• From the editor: A change is gonna come

• Disinformation report: Paid editing by a former head of state's business enterprise

• In the media: Fernando, governance, and rugby

• Opinion: The (Universal) Code of Conduct

• Op-Ed: A Little Fun Goes A Long Way

• Changing the world: The reach of protest images on Wikipedia

• Recent research: Quality of aquatic and anatomical articles

• Traffic report: The verdict is guilty, guilty, guilty

• News from Wiki Education: Encouraging professional physicists to engage in outreach on Wikipedia

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Political endorsements on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

At last, it is working for the first time after subscribing. I think Special:Diff/1018875191 helps. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 10:32, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Political endorsements on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ivory Tower

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Why close an AfD while mentioning WP:NPOSSIBLE? That's assuming something that was never stated. I undid your closure. That was completely inappropriate. SL93 (talk) 03:29, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

This thread is moot, see below. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 15:01, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Deletion review for Ivory Tower (1998 film)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Ivory Tower (1998 film). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

procedural self-notification ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 15:01, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.