User talk:AnwinNovaTrichy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Trichy Tollgate has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--SharabSalam (talk) 10:13, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tiruchirappalli, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 16:31, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Controversial topic area alerts[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Newslinger talk 20:29, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Merku Thodarchi Malai. — Newslinger talk 20:30, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Next Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly election has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 20:32, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Incidents noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Guru Trichy. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 21:06, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion is now at WP:ANI § User:AnwinNovaTrichy (formerly User:Guru Trichy) to reflect your recent username change. — Newslinger talk 01:48, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020[edit]

Stop icon
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Newslinger talk 04:02, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AnwinNovaTrichy, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

— Newslinger talk 11:17, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not even concerned what the check user decides, But genuinely feel wiki to be becoming more of a political syndicate and less of a free source of information, New comers and people wishing to contribute get intimidated by editors who almost always seem to be pushing an agenda, For some reason, This article feels more and more accurate judging by my experiences, I had never made any personal attacks, Yet i have been specifically targeted by a set of editors, all whom almost always seem to be having an agenda, Your policies and intimidating actions, This conversation here is considered trolling for some reason, I honestly feel wikipedia is less of an example of open site and more of a site that is completely against net neutrality, Wikipedia seems to believe CNN to be this completely neutral, reliable source of information while fox news is "conservative", I am not asking you people to not call fox news as a conservative group, I am requesting that you call CNN as left leaning, Yes, I did create another account, A clean start, But what exact option did i have? I was indefinitely banned in my original account, So i am not 'allowed' to be a part of this so called 'free and open' community? Is that how this is supposed to work? And all that despite evidently being non-disruptive, If editors are to continue preying on people they dont agree with on subjective topics instead of actually making sure articles follow a neutral point of view, This website is just a hollow, opinionated, far far left version of opindia, Call this a rant, or me being salty, Delete my talk page calling it 'trolling', I do not care, Congratulations to Newslinger on managing to kick out yet another person that doesnt share your opinion and keeping this website free of neutral information, Have a nice day! AnwinNovaTrichy 2:25, 23 October 2020 (UTC)