User talk:Andy UK

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Andy UK, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  -- Francs2000 11:44, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Andy UK! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 940 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Russell Mills (artist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:43, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jane Walker[edit]

The article Jane Walker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While what she does is honorable nothing is notable enough for an encyclopedia entry. an MBE is also pretty common

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patadyong (January 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Andy UK, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patadyong has been accepted[edit]

Patadyong, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:08, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nice work improving Patadyong! If you want to turn your GoogleBooks links into footnotes, you can plug the URL into http://reftag.appspot.com and it will give you the full footnote format. You then place the footnote next to the fact it proves (not just paste it at the bottom) and the coding will automatically number it and list it at the bottom in order for you. See WP:REFB for how to footnote. If you have a photo of this dress that you yourself took (or pre-dates 1923 copyright) you can upload it to Wikimedia Commons and display it on the article. MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:10, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]