User talk:AlexJFox/Archive 2

Guild Wars merger

Can you provide a reason for requesting the merger? I currently disagree, but I would like to see and better understand your reasons so that I can consider another view before I post a reply on the article. Also, to centralize the discussion in one place, I suggest having one of the article talk pages point to the other's talk page ... otherwise, you risk having two seperate or redundant conversations going about the proposal. --- Barek (talk •contribs) - 03:38, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

In order to maintain a central location for the discussion, I copy/pasted your reply from my talk page onto the article talk page at Talk:Guild Wars Prophecies‎#Merge. As it's not standard practice for another user to move/post comments by another editor, I wanted to be sure to notify you of this so that you are fully aware of the moved posting and can review/verify that I did not modify your text/comments in the move. I moved the content because another editor was also involved - and the article talk page provides greater visibility to your reasons so that more editors can be aware of your concerns.

After moving the content, I also posted a reply to your comments. --- Barek (talk •contribs) - 17:25, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Account creation tool

I have requested an account on the account creation tool to assist new users in creating a wikipedia account.^Alex J _Fox (Talk) (Contribs) 21:05, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. Unfortunately I was unable to process your request. The ACC tool is a powerful program, and at the present time your account is either too new for us to determine whether you would know how to properly use the tool or that you have not attained the necessary level of trust to be granted access. Please don't take this personally and feel free to contact me if you have any questions. ——RyanLupin • (talk) 21:08, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Understood, I shall re-apply when I have more contributions under my belt to prove that I only have good intentions for wikipedia :) ^Alex J _Fox (Talk) (Contribs) 21:10, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Warning Users

Wikipedians are expected to assume innocence regarding suspected vandalism. Remember that. Next time suggest using the sandbox. kthnxbai. The is regarding the user JamesManes Ismouton (talk) 01:20, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

For reference, I replied to this user on his/her talk-page pointing out the reasons as to why I was correct in warning said user. I received no reply and this user blanked his/her talk page. ^Alex J _Fox(Talk) (Contribs) 20:23, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TescoTechLogo 03.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TescoTechLogo 03.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 01:09, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

CVUA

Hi I'm Obtund! I am you new instructor for the CVUA academy and I am ready to train you. I tend to set up a central page where we can have ongoing dialogue away from our talk pages, and focus exclusively on fighting vandalism. I'll set that up once I hear back from you and we can move the conversation there. Looking forward to hearing from you. Obtund^Talk 04:06, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi Obtund, thanks for the prompt reply, a central page sounds like a great idea, I work 5 days out of 7 a week, so I'll be most active in evenings (GMT) and as time allows on my days off from work, I look forward to learning from you and thanks for your time :) ^Alex J _Fox (Talk) (Contribs) 14:33, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Okay - when you're ready to begin, just indicate so on your CVUA page. ObtundTalk 02:41, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

IRC Cloak Request

This is an edit to provide a diff for my IRC Cloak request ^Alex J _Fox(Talk) (Contribs) 23:27, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Cam at RFPP

Would you please return to the "Cam" section of WP:RFPP? I've offered a comment and also asked for input from the admin who declined your request, since some action might still be required. Nyttend (talk) 01:03, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Done, thanks for the heads-up. ^Alex J _Fox(Talk) (Contribs) 12:43, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Formulatin/Drafts/Luminar

Hello AlexJFox,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged User:Formulatin/Drafts/Luminar for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, --Mysterytrey 22:36, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Re:Warning users

I completely forgot about warning users, and I just realized that my browser is blocking the popups to talk pages that Twinkle creates. I'll be sure to warn vandals in the future. Thanks for the reminder! --AznBurger (talk) 04:04, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Al-Aqsa Mosque edit

You are not allowed to remove the arabic references either as this makes no difference between you and the person you were correcting. Muslims don't recognize the "temple mount". It is believed that the Al- Aqsa mosque is the mosque itself and the surrounding area. If you want to use it as temple mount, then say "temple mount" according to jews and aqsa according to muslims. Besides there is an article about the temple mount, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_Mount). You might want to make edits there. Let us not be biased here.

Also read: "n 1977, digging continued and a large ancient tunnel was opened below the women's prayer area. A further tunnel was unearthed under the mosque, going from east to west, in 1979" From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excavations_at_the_Temple_Mount

If you get on the net and search, you will see that muslims believe the whole area is Aqsa and thus the digging takes place under the mosque by the israeli regime, hence their anger. And the jews believe it was solomon's temple. Therefore in all fairness, you can edit the article about the temple mount, i dont think anybody would disagree. If you have read the article about the excavation of the temple mount, you will notice some tunnels were under the Aqsa mosque. I am very brutal against bias articles. All articles must be fair.

Thanks SajjadF (talk) 22:48, 19 September 2012 (UTC) 

Rollback

Congratulations on your CVUA graduation - and also on getting rollback; I've just enabled it on your account. Your CVUA page shows that you already know what it's for, but I'd recommend just refreshing your memory at WP:ROLLBACK. After that, off you go! Yunshui 雲‍水 17:50, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Will do, and thanks very much :) ^Alex J _Fox(Talk) (Contribs) 20:46, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Congrats on great Rb rights! A job well done! Obtund^Talk 21:58, 28 September 2012 (UTC)