User talk:Alensmith

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Alensmith! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 11:53, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Alensmith, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Alensmith! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:23, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the club, you should know this as a General Knowledge[edit]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--Human3015 (talk) 15:52, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015[edit]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Yakub Memon. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Human3015 (talk) 16:54, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are on 3rr[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Yakub Memon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Human3015 (talk) 17:24, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Alensmith reported by User:Human3015 (Result: ). Thank you. Human3015 (talk) 17:29, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ashraf Asif Jalali[edit]

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Alensmith, thanks for creating Ashraf Asif Jalali!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 23:22, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Sulfurboy , I have tried little bit to improve further.Alensmith (talk) 14:36, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Obaidullah Khan Azmi edit[edit]

You hve recently edited Obaidullah Khan Azmi and added a new section Obaidullah Khan Azmi#Shah Bano Case Protest.Texts are coppied from http://bhindibazaar.asia/nov-20-1985-huge-muslim-protest-bandh-in-mumbai/

You are adviced to write in your own words instead of copy paste.If you do not change the words and sentences of that section it caould be deleted by any other editor or administrator in future. See Wikipedia:Copyright violations

Ejaz92 (talk) 06:50, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You correctly saw the edits,I was in bit hurry to improve that Article.Can You help me in that.Regards.Alensmith (talk) 07:03, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Dargah-e-Ala Hazrat. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ping me with {{u|Jim1138}} and sign "~~~~" or message me on my talk page. 07:43, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don't add wp:puffery to the article. Use an encyclopedic wp:tone. Avoid overuse of words and phrases such as influential, powerful Ping me with {{u|Jim1138}} and sign "~~~~" or message me on my talk page. 08:07, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment here Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Akhtar Raza Khan.Still not accepted.Lots of trouble.Ejaz92 (talk) 07:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Ashraf Asif Jalali has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

does not meet basic or academic notability guidelines; lack of significant coverage in reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PohranicniStraze (talk) 08:05, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]