User talk:AgustinusHal

Welcome to my account. There are some information that must be understand.

Deviation report[edit]

Hello, guys!

Long time no see. I'm inactive from Wikipedia for six months to prevent vandalism that I do. If you want to editing, check the grammar, comprehension, and the source first. If it is secure, trust to the Administrator as compliment.

My Current Local Time: UTC+7.00]]

My Current Status: Regularly Work Week / ~~On Vacation (Travel)~~ /

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agustin (July 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:AgustinusHal/sandbox/Agustin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:27, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! AgustinusHal, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:27, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:YSSYguy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - BilCat (talk) 07:18, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Boeing Business Jet. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - BilCat (talk) 07:18, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User:Hzh has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hzh (talk) 08:54, 5 August 2015 (UTC) (benjamin (talk) 22:13, 18 August 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Your edit summaries[edit]

Please stop using misleading edit summaries, such as this edit, this edit and this edit. None of those edits bear any resemblance to what you say you did in the summaries. Thank you YSSYguy (talk) 08:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to User talk:Tafeax can easily be misinterpreted. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you. Hzh (talk) 08:49, 13 August 2015 (UTC) (benjamin (talk) 22:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC))[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AgustinusHal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the Administrator User:MilborneOne is harrassing me

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Huon (talk) 22:29, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.