User talk:AdleNut
April 2023[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Linguistics. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Donald Albury 13:17, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. But I don't see the point of keeping that tag there indefinitely. Whatever sources are missing should be fixed pronto and the tag removed. AdleNut (talk) 20:26, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- But, the tag should not be removed until the sources have been provided, or there is a consensus on the talk page that it is no longer needed. There is no deadline in Wikipedia Donald Albury 22:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- But if there is no deadline in Wikipedia then there is no need to tag an article indefinitely and give people enough time to add sources. Moreover, there is no specific guideline on what kind of sources are needed. This is a loosely hanging statement about sources needed. If someone who added that tag feels sources are needed, they should know what sources are needed and add them there themselves or at least add the "citation needed" marks wherever necessary. AdleNut (talk) 17:32, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- But, the tag should not be removed until the sources have been provided, or there is a consensus on the talk page that it is no longer needed. There is no deadline in Wikipedia Donald Albury 22:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. But I don't see the point of keeping that tag there indefinitely. Whatever sources are missing should be fixed pronto and the tag removed. AdleNut (talk) 20:26, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
July 2023[edit]
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Devaki Singh, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. 2A00:23EE:1998:5351:C42D:25FF:FEC5:F44E (talk) 16:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.