Jump to content

User talk:A248

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Few Questions[edit]

I have a few questions about how Wikipedia works. I am a new user, and while I have read several pages about the policies and guidelines to acquaintance myself with the rules and the general atmosphere and aim of Wikipedia, there are a few things I am still unsure about.

I was initially somewhat confused as to how article talk pages and user talk pages work. It seems that edits are used to add comments. Indeed, edits are used for everything on Wikipedia. However, I resisted this conclusion at first, because it seems open to a flaw. If two users edit a page simultaneously, a race condition emerges and one edit may be overridden. So my question is, given this design decision, how does Wikipedia prevent or avoid situations of simultaneously editing?

My second question relates to the contribution process on Wikipedia. I contribute also to open source software development, in particular with pull requests via Github. There, any contributions I make are first reviewed by a project committer (project lead) before being merged into the main repository. My understanding of Wikipedia is that edits made are immediately visible on article pages. However, is there any sort of informal review process following an edit? More specifically, what I mean to ask is, should I make a mistake such as a typographical error, will it be noticed in a log of changes read by editors who spend their time on such things, or will it be fixed by the next user who comes along to the article page and happens to notice the typo?

Thirdly, I have found the recommendations on the use of real names in usernames. The article notes real names increase the potential for harassment. Is harassment a serious issue on Wikipedia? Has it happened before and to what degree? I mostly use my username when contributing to projects on the internet, but in some cases, notably git commits and JIRA accounts, I have used my real name or have had some reference to my real name in my profile. I've never had any cases of harassment in contributing code to or filing bugs on open source software. How common is it to use real names on Wikipedia?

Fourthly

Thanks,

A248 (talk) 01:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  1. WP:EDITCONFLICT
  2. Both! A Wikipedia:Recent changes patroller might fix it or someone who just happens upon the article. I have fixed vandalism that persisted for three and a half years, but on well-trafficked pages, corrections happen quickly. Of course, you are more than welcome to return to the page and fix your own errors. Wikipedia is good but by no means perfect. We're a work in progress toward better processes.
  3. I don't know, honestly, how prevalent harassment is on Wikipedia, and I suspect gathering good data would prove challenging—we don't know how many targets of harassment have simply quietly left. Even Wikipedians who have revealed their off-wiki identities don't edit under their real names: unsurprisingly, Jimbo Wales is not his real name. Perhaps some who edit Wikipedia in some official capacity—Wikipedia:Wikipedians in residence, for example—use their real name as a username...but even that is not, say, their full name.
  4. No, thank you. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 05:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hello A248 and welcome to Wikipedia! We're so glad you decided to join us. Let me try to add to Rotideypoc41352's answers.
  • You are correct that edits are very central to Wikipedia. And you are also correct that edit conflicts sometimes occur (click the blue highlighted link for more info.). If an edit conflict occurs, the system will give options on how to reconcile your edit with the edit of the previous user. Sometimes you're allowed to simply merge your edit with the edit of the previous user. Other times if you find yourself in an edit conflict, you may have to reinsert your text in an entirely new edit. Edit conflicts can be frustrating and the system doesn't always detect them. Just try to be patient and don't get upset if someone accidentally erases your edit in an edit conflict. When trying to fix an edit conflict, make sure to clarify exactly what you're doing in the edit summary.
  • As for your second question, you are again correct that most edits are visible once the user hits "submit." Some articles have what's called pending changes protection where an edit has to be "approved" or "declined" by a pending changes reviewer before that edit gets published (I happen to be a pending changes reviewer!). There are other similar mechanisms like this, but I won't get into them right now. But you're asking if there's any review after an edit has been submitted. The answer to that question is yes. Every single editor on Wikipedia has something called a watchlist. Editors are allowed to add any article on Wikipedia to their watchlist. If you have a particular page on your watchlist, and someone makes an edit to that page, your watchlist will automatically be updated. You can then review that edit at your pleasure. A more "problematic" edit (e.g. a disruptive edit or an act of vandalism), will normally trigger what's called an edit filter. The edit filter can prevent that edit entirely or it can "tag" the edit, and the edit will appear in a log where users can review it. Once again, the system is not perfect and mistakes do happen. As Rotodeypoc41352 already mentioned, recent changes patrollers help fix these errors. If you ever see a typo in an article, please correct it!
  • As for your last question, I'm afraid I don't have a spectacular answer for you either!. I honestly don't know the statistics on harassment on Wikipedia. I won't sugar coat it; harassment does occur. If you are harrassed, please seek help from an administrator. Contributing under a pseudonym is far more common than contributing under a real name. But I do occasionally see real names as well. Some of our best admins (e.g., Joe Roe, Doug Weller) contribute under their real names. But it's really your choice. Remember, Wikipedia is one of the most highly trafficked sites in the world. If you decide to edit under your real name, just keep in mind that every single edit you make will be connected to your real name.
  • I truly hope I could answer your questions. Feel free to ping me--by typing {{u|Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d}}--or leave a message on my talk page. Enjoy Wikipedia! Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 06:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, A248! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 05:38, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Introduction to contentious topics[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

== Welcome! ==

Hi A248! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

I've noticed that you've expressed an interest in the Palestine/Israel conflict. Unfortunately, due to a history of conflict and disruptive editing it has been designated a contentious topic and is subject to some strict rules.

The rule that affects you most as new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to Palestine/Israel conflict unless you are logged into an account and that account is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.

This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.

The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.

Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to your being blocked from editing.


As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Selfstudier (talk) 17:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Conflict Kitchen, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 13:34, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]