User talk:98.215.153.31

August 2015

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Epilepsy. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 03:33, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

References

Remember that when adding medical content please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:45, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

Hello, I'm Dewritech. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Special Forces (United States Army), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dewritech (talk) 19:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Rainer Woelki. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Elizium23 (talk) 02:04, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Edits to Pope Francis' visit to the United States

Hi, I appreciate your research and diligent discovery of links related to this story. The URLs you've found have lots of potential for filling out the article. However, the style of Wikipedia (see WP:MOS) is not to simply stack links onto words, but to write and re-write that content into prose. So I'd encourage you to do so. The section "Preparation," for example, is empty and could really use your help with the content you've identified in those links. So for now, I'm going to revert the link additions without prejudice, and encourage you to add your own written text to the article while referencing those links. If you need help, please do stop by the WP:TEAHOUSE. Thanks. -- Fuzheado | Talk 12:35, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

The article asked for more sources- more links to other web pages. How is a person supposed to easily summarize content from 50 different sources without either violating copyright, or going on and on about things that have already been spoken about in the article. To do so takes a very large effort. Additionally, trying to paraphrase even one source, let alone dozens, without breaking Wikipedia copyright guidelines or copyright laws, is very cumbersome. If people want information, they can use their mouse or pad and click on the links I added and be referred to the websites, where they will get all the information they can handle. My site is far from the only one to have many links without words or commentary attached to each individual source added. Some Wikipedia articles have up to 500 sources. Many of those articles feature commentary, but in many of those articles, a multitude of sources are just added for informational purposes. Adding sources, for people to click on- even if they are not formatted just the way Wikipedia would like them to be, which for many sources, takes a lot of time- and without having to invest one's precious time into somehow managing to add information from each one, should be perfectly legitimate. The next time someone undoes an entire day- and more's work of mine, they should give me advance notice before altering what I contributed- if it hadn't been for what I (and only me) added, the article would be not worth reading and would still have an official notice saying it had too few sources, needed more, and should be merged or deleted.

Hi, you said: How is a person supposed to easily summarize content from 50 different sources without either violating copyright, or going on and on about things that have already been spoken about in the article. To do so takes a very large effort. - What you described is exactly what goes on every second in Wikipedia since 2001! As the sum of all human knowledge, that's exactly what the point of Wikipedia is: reading existing sources and writing it in our own words. If you are not interesting in doing the writing, I invite you to go to the article's talk page where I've put in your list of sources you've been researching, In this way, you are helping out in the research and link identification, even if you don't want to get involved with the deep writing. Please see: Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_mirror_or_a_repository_of_links.2C_images.2C_or_media_files for more info on why we don't simply include lots of links into an article. Thanks. -- Fuzheado | Talk 14:04, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

That sounds like a very, very good idea. I will continue to search the Web for sources, and put them in the talk page list. Then, if they are recognized as being meritorious- some may not be- they can be formatted properly, and eventually, moved to the article's page, with comment added.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:25, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

Hello, I'm Rubbish computer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Keith O'Brien, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 18:43, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sacrament of Penance & Reconciliation (Catholic Church). Elizium23 (talk) 04:15, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Keeping up your style

A big thank to your edit about Cyprus archaeological discovery. Please continue to maintain BC/AD format. I think that bce/ce dating is an affectation that does nothing to change the semantic content of using the Christian Era. Non-Christian people still understand where it came from and calling it by another name isn't any more inclusive, just patronizing. ༆ (talk) 21:57, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Page number

What page was that content you added about heart failure form? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:51, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Bad Aibling rail accident

Hello .31; I've reverted the changes back to the initial numbers because the cite being used is several hours out-of-date; following the press-release by the Police at 17:05 CET (16:05 UTC), the numbers of injures were significantly reduced. —Sladen (talk) 18:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Refs

Are really needed. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:26, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

2016 Ecuador earthquake

Hello, I was a little too hasty with the revert button. It appeared at first glance that you may have been futzing with the text. It happens quite a bit around here. You know what you can do to help the situation? Use the edit summary. Just type a few words about what you're changing or fixing and that will make a lot of editor's lives easier. Thanks for listening, Dawnseeker2000 02:33, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Hydrocele testis seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:26, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 03:28, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

References

[[

File:Information.svg|35px|left|alt=]]

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:41, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Confusion with methamphetamine

I am not sure how you can confuse menthol and methamphetamine. JSR (talk) 21:33, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017

Hello, I'm Bojo1498. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Euphoria, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. bojo | talk | contribs 00:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

John Glenn

I undid your edit to John Glenn as it was unreferenced. Adding references is how we ensure that content is valid. Without references, a reader can not easily validate information and there is no presumption of accuracy. To add a reference, please read Help:Referencing for beginners and Help:footnotes. This is covered by the Wikipedia policy of wp:verifiability (WP:V). Please wp:cite your edits with wp:reliable sources (RS). Per WP:V unsourced content can be removed. Your edits are saved in the wp:page history. Please add references when you restore the content. You might be able to copy them from Hidden Figures. If you would like some assitance, please wp:ping me here or leave a note on my talk page. I'll have to watch Hidden Figures Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 01:42, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Fetal viability, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 22:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

What part of the ref supports this

"For those patients who have mild sepsis and can walk and ambulate on their own or with minor assistance, and do not have abnormal heart murmurs or rhytms and have relatively good hydration, respiratory rate, and blood pressure, daily small walks around the hospital floor with a nurse aide or nurse may be beneficial; and all patients in bed who can move should regularly reposition themselves, which also helps prevent skin injury (those patients requiring help to reposition themselves should receive it).

Also, while some patients with sepsis, at least initially, will be non per os (nothing, except perhaps ice cubes or water sips, by mouth), until a definite diagnosis is made and any surgery recovered from, when the patients are stable and able to drink and then eat orally, they should be allowed small to medium calorie-rich and protein- and carbohydrate-rich feedings that adhere to their electrolyte and vitamin and mineral requirements, gradually taking in larger and more intricate meals as able. Patients also benefit from self-ambulating, if necessary with some assistance, regularly cleaning teeth and brushing hair and gently shaving, and if able, taking regular showers. These measures can all contribute to improving mortality and morbidity, especially in mild sepsis with few complications." Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:13, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Sepsis

Hi there 98, I see you're interested in introducing some news on the sepsis page. Per WP:BRD, after being reverted you should really take this to the article's talk page and open it up to the community for discussion instead of trying to force the edit back in. Dr. Marik's assertions are noteworthy but it's only news right now and this proposed therapy hasn't yet been subjected to high-quality RCTs and reviewed in high-quality secondary sources suitable for inclusion per WP:MEDRS. Also, I do not see where in the February 2017 Critical Care systematic review & meta-analysis that fevers > 105 can cause damage (I'm not necessarily disagreeing with this statement but by putting it there you're suggesting that this reference backs up this specific claim). Where exactly do you see this in the article? TylerDurden8823 (talk) 03:08, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

I understand your concerns about the study and the story, and I agree that it should now be discussed in the talk page. Regarding the fever information, I had a high fever in childhood back in 1985, age 4 1/2 (born 3/27/81), that got to 105 degrees Fahrenheit. The nurses and doctors in the ICU at Pekin Hospital, in my hometown of Pekin, Illinois, and then at the Level I adult/pediatric trauma center, OSF Saint Francis Medical Center and the Children's Hospital of Illinois, in Peoria, told my parents that any fever at or higher than 105 degrees Fahrenheit had the potential to cause at least some temporary or permanent brain damage and to start to damage some of the body's proteins and perhaps lead to febrile seizures (though I did not suffer any, I later developed idiopathic epilepsy- meaning no official cause was found, though a concussion I received after the infection and fever was likely more responsible). In the present, a month ago, I was hospitalized for sepsis at OSF Saint Francis, due to relatively mild sepsis from a urinary tract infection that had spread to (at least one) kidney; the night I was admitted, I was still in sepsis, and had a rectal temperature of slightly above 104 degrees Fahrenheit. My condition improved very well due to swift treatment begun in the ER and at bedside. But the ER and intermediate-care medical recovery nurses and the hospitalists and infectious disease doctors and a consulting surgeon (the doctors were from the University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria) told me that they had to keep my fever below 105 to avoid brain damage or protein damage, and that, in sepsis, any fever over 100.5 F would be cause for concern and use of antipyretics to reduce the fever (until the 100.5 F mark, they and I preferred to just monitor the fever's course).

April 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Intensive care unit, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial. Gareth Griffith-Jones, The Welsh Buzzard (Talk) 08:00, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Recent edit to Pre-eclampsia

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Pre-eclampsia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! TushiTalk To Me 16:42, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

June 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Malala Yousafzai, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Reb1981 (talk) 01:44, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

References

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:03, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Oshwah. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Fertility awareness seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:15, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Intensive care unit, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 22:28, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

References

Adding references is how we ensure that content is valid. Without references, a reader can not easily validate information and there is no presumption of accuracy. See Help:Referencing for beginners and Help:footnotes. There is a tool that can help: See wp:RefToolbar/2.0. This is covered by the Wikipedia policy of wp:verifiability (WP:V). Please wp:cite your edits with wp:reliable sources (RS). For medical content, wp:RSMED may be needed. Per WP:V unsourced content can be removed. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 22:29, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Cox Convention Center. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:09, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Canadian County, Oklahoma. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Home Lander (talk) 00:36, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Medical (ICD-10-PCS) definition

Hello. If you are the same person who edited Removal from this IP address, thank you for your good-faith contributions, but please see the new messages at Talk:Removal#Medical (ICD-10-PCS) definition. Thanks, Certes (talk) 01:01, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

Hello, I'm CataracticPlanets. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Entering Heaven alive, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CataracticPlanets (talk) 02:37, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2018

Hello, I'm Aspening. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Asystole, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aspening (talk) 03:04, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on List of burn centers in the United States. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. →‎ GS →‎ ☎ → 06:23, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

---