User talk:66.76.193.27

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.

November 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm RPI2026F1. I noticed that you recently removed content from Fred Trump without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RPI2026F1 (talk) 15:12, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hello. please provide specific examples of inaccuracies in the summary. 66.76.193.27 (talk) 15:23, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You cannot just delete an entire section on an unfounded opinion. Discuss it on the talk page first. RPI2026F1 (talk) 15:24, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why not? Why should an entire sections based on political malice and bigotry be allowed to stay in the article? 66.76.193.27 (talk) 15:26, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just saying to mention it on the talk page first. The more (in)famous a person is, the harder it is to delete things about them, especially at the scale of entire sections. RPI2026F1 (talk) 15:27, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that. Who is allowing this content to remain published in the first place?
This is classic Res ipsa loquitur and I really shouldn't have to provide a detailed explanation as to why this section is inappropriate. That being said, I appreciate your feedback and will pursue it future major edits by starting with the talk page. Thank you. 66.76.193.27 (talk) 15:33, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I will say I read through the page and the section you removed is ridiculous, and there should be something like a RfC to figure out what to do with it. RPI2026F1 (talk) 15:35, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, based on your profile, honing political smears is not in your professed mandate. 66.76.193.27 (talk) 15:24, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am not trying to politically smear anyone? You cannot just delete 5000 characters on a person like Fred Trump without some discussion first. RPI2026F1 (talk) 15:25, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay we are discussing it now. I asked you to cite examples that make the edit summary inaccurate which was the obvious implication give the request for an "accurate" edit summary. 66.76.193.27 (talk) 15:28, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, I think we should move the discussion to Talk:Fred Trump, and also the burden of proof is on the person doing the change as opposed to the person restoring to equilibrium. RPI2026F1 (talk) 15:29, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]