User talk:61.68.144.68

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eyre County, Queensland (December 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jeromeenriquez were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Jeromeenriquez (talk) 03:55, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 61.68.144.68! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jeromeenriquez (talk) 03:55, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yappar County, Queensland has been accepted[edit]

Yappar County, Queensland, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julien of Vienna (January 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eagleash (talk) 13:18, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edistus of Vienne (January 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AssumeGoodWraith was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 03:07, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crescentius of Vienne has been accepted[edit]

Crescentius of Vienne, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 03:16, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edistus of Vienne (January 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AssumeGoodWraith was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 03:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (61.68.144.68) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! Rusalkii (talk) 03:21, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Willicaire of Vienne has been accepted[edit]

Willicaire of Vienne, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 03:27, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lupicinus of Vienne (January 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 04:04, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Theobold of Vienne (January 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 18:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying articles from French Wikipedia[edit]

I notice that you are adding articles translated / copied from French Wikipedia - and have many more lined up at AFC - that are without proper attribution. Please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia - it is not permitted simply to import/translate material without giving proper credit to the authors. Also, however it is that you're copying them has the effect of coding the diacritics in the references - see for example Willicaire of Vienne: e.g.: Leon Dupont Lachenal, « Les abbés de St-Maurice d'Agaune [archive] », Échos de Saint-Maurice, 1944 (édition numérique 2012), tome 42, p. 85-86, « Abbés de Saint-Maurice et évêques de Sion » et « Mainmise des Rodolphiens et des Savoie. Les Praets » etc. You should be cleaning these things up yourself - it's not fair to expect other editors to do it for you, more particularly as you are not importing the internet links where they occur in the references, so someone else has to retrieve them from fr-Wiki. This is far too much work to expect for an obscure stub. Sorry to moan, but best to take this on board before you do too many more.Ingratis (talk) 01:39, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zechariah of Vienne (January 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingratis was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Ingratis (talk) 06:27, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above message is automated and not quite accurate, in that the topic does warrant an article, even if only a stub, but that stub already exists. Ingratis (talk) 06:31, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Martinus of Vienne, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 07:17, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jean de Norry (January 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 11:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Philip of Vienne (January 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 18:38, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Redford County, Queensland (January 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Slywriter (talk) 04:21, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raginfred of Vienne has been accepted[edit]

Raginfred of Vienne, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 10:54, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Translation attribution wrt your articles and drafts for bishops and archbishops of Vienne[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When translating a foreign-language Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've translated content, disclosing the translation and linking to the translated page, e.g., Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk pages of the page you placed the translation. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have translated material before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Ingratis (talk) 17:46, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gontard (Bishop of Vienne) (February 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nyanardsan was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nyanardsan (talk) 03:30, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 20:36, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Landalenus of Vienne (February 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Siliconred was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SiliconRed (talk) 13:16, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saint Caldeoldus (February 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 18:12, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saint Éoalde (February 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 18:12, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jean Gerard de Poitiers has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jean Gerard de Poitiers. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:15, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jean Gerard de Poitiers (March 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:18, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Humbert d'Albon (April 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Noahfgodard was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Noahfgodard (talk) 19:09, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello 61.68.144.68! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. I see you were warned about this at the beginning of January; this is probably why your drafts have been sitting around at Articles for Creation for so long. Thank you. asilvering (talk) 05:23, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bertericus of Vienne (April 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 05:58, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saint Blidramne (April 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 06:00, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saint Bobolin (April 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 06:00, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wolferius of Vienne (April 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 06:03, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ursion of Vienne (April 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 06:06, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geoffroy Vassal (April 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 06:13, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ether of Vienne (April 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 06:15, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cheviot County, Queensland has been accepted[edit]

Cheviot County, Queensland, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 12:03, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glanworth, Queensland has been accepted[edit]

Glanworth, Queensland, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 12:05, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eyre County, Queensland has been accepted[edit]

Eyre County, Queensland, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 12:05, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julian of Vienne has been accepted[edit]

Julian of Vienne, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Doric Loon (talk) 18:39, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I accepted your article because I think the subject is notable, and you had acceptable references. But it was unbelievably messy. If you look at the article history you will see the amount of time I had to put in to make it publishable. Please do this clean-up yourself before you submit an article: it is not fair on your wikipedia colleagues to throw such a mess at them.
Also, given the number of articles you are proposing, I strongly suggest you get a username. --Doric Loon (talk) 19:46, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Verus of Vienne has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Verus of Vienne. Thanks! Doric Loon (talk) 23:34, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Austrebert of Vienne has been accepted[edit]

Austrebert of Vienne, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ingratis (talk) 05:13, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paschasius of Vienne has been accepted[edit]

Paschasius of Vienne, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ingratis (talk) 02:08, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simplicius of Vienne has been accepted[edit]

Simplicius of Vienne, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ingratis (talk) 22:31, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isicius I of Vienne has been accepted[edit]

Isicius I of Vienne, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ingratis (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Edistus of Vienne[edit]

Information icon Hello, 61.68.144.68. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Edistus of Vienne, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:00, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Zechariah of Vienne[edit]

Information icon Hello, 61.68.144.68. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zechariah of Vienne, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jean de Norry[edit]

Information icon Hello, 61.68.144.68. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jean de Norry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, 61.68.144.68. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Redford County, Queensland, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, 61.68.144.68. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gontard (Bishop of Vienne), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:04, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Edistus of Vienne[edit]

Hello, 61.68.144.68. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Edistus of Vienne".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:08, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zechariah of Vienne[edit]

Hello, 61.68.144.68. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zechariah of Vienne".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:27, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, 61.68.144.68. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stephen II (archbishop of Vienne), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 61.68.144.68. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Redford County".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:20, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Landalenus of Vienne[edit]

Information icon Hello, 61.68.144.68. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Landalenus of Vienne, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Saint Caldeoldus[edit]

Information icon Hello, 61.68.144.68. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Saint Caldeoldus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 61.68.144.68. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gontard".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:39, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, 61.68.144.68. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jean Gerard de Poitiers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Saint Caldeoldus[edit]

Hello, 61.68.144.68. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Saint Caldeoldus".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:18, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Humbert d'Albon[edit]

Information icon Hello, 61.68.144.68. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Humbert d'Albon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ursion of Vienne[edit]

Information icon Hello, 61.68.144.68. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ursion of Vienne, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Saint Blidramne[edit]

Information icon Hello, 61.68.144.68. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Saint Blidramne, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ether of Vienne[edit]

Information icon Hello, 61.68.144.68. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ether of Vienne, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Saint Bobolin[edit]

Information icon Hello, 61.68.144.68. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Saint Bobolin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Geoffroy Vassal[edit]

Information icon Hello, 61.68.144.68. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Geoffroy Vassal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bertericus of Vienne[edit]

Information icon Hello, 61.68.144.68. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bertericus of Vienne, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Wolferius of Vienne[edit]

Information icon Hello, 61.68.144.68. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wolferius of Vienne, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ether of Vienne[edit]

Hello, 61.68.144.68. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ether of Vienne".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:24, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lupicinus of Vienne[edit]

Information icon Hello, 61.68.144.68. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lupicinus of Vienne, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:36, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Philip of Vienne[edit]

Information icon Hello, 61.68.144.68. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Philip of Vienne, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:10, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Philip of Vienne[edit]

Hello, 61.68.144.68. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Philip of Vienne".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 09:12, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 61.68.144.68. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stephen II".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:43, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jean Gerard de Poitiers[edit]

Hello, 61.68.144.68. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jean Gerard de Poitiers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:27, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ursion of Vienne[edit]

Hello, 61.68.144.68. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ursion of Vienne".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Saint Blidramne[edit]

Hello, 61.68.144.68. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saint Blidramne".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Geoffroy Vassal[edit]

Hello, 61.68.144.68. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Geoffroy Vassal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:03, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Saint Bobolin[edit]

Hello, 61.68.144.68. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saint Bobolin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:03, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bertericus of Vienne[edit]

Hello, 61.68.144.68. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bertericus of Vienne".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:04, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wolferius of Vienne[edit]

Hello, 61.68.144.68. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wolferius of Vienne".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:04, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lupicinus of Vienne[edit]

Hello, 61.68.144.68. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lupicinus of Vienne".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:19, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]