User talk:2601:196:181:BE00:E102:4EFB:8DC:D9D0

December 2022

Hello, I'm RPI2026F1. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to They Were Expendable have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. RPI2026F1 (talk) 17:26, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

They Were Expendable

I reverted your edit because while you claim you are "improving the grammar", this edit makes no sense: "Sandy attends a dinner in her honor at the PT Base, reigniting the flame between her and Rusty." -> "Sandy attends a dinner in her honor at the PT Base, reigniting the flame between she and Rusty." RPI2026F1 (talk) 17:33, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your explanation.

That is a single edit. If you have a beef with that single item changed then make your change to that item alone and explain it in an edit summary, like any other editor - not abusing the power to mass revert edits without justification.

That is also proper English. The actual correct grammar is "Rusty and she", but that has become rather archaic at this point. Not the correct "she and Rusty". 2601:196:181:BE00:E102:4EFB:8DC:D9D0 (talk) 17:40, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

---