User talk:192.154.91.225

Note to editors: This IP address is registered to GlaxoSmithKline and has been used to promote their products on Wikipedia.

January 2006

Your edits at Anantapur are not in corresponce with wikipedia guidelines and policies. Please read them before editing Wikipedia. Your edits there will be reverted. Andries 15:31, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

June 2006

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Computerjoe's talk 19:53, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

August 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Amanda Congdon. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. —Rob (talk) 16:54, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

signing in

It looks like this is a shared company IP, I'll sign in to differentiate myself. --192.154.91.225 18:17, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

June 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Millersville University of Pennsylvania, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Andrew_pmk | Talk 17:14, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Article you contribute to nominated for deletion

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Halloween_songs --164.107.222.23 17:56, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

August 2007

Please do not promote GlaxoSmithKline products or messages on Wikipedia. We are an encyclopedia with a strong neutral point of view policy. As such editing Wikipedia in order to promote a product is not appropriate. Please see our guidelines for more on how contribute to Wikipedia in areas where you may have a conflict of interest. Thanks. -- SiobhanHansa 18:06, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

September 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Philadelphia Flyers. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Resolute 15:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Premature ejaculation, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tiptoety ^talk 04:56, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Shroud (comics) do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'geocities\.com' (link(s): http://www.geocities.com/jhaeman/Comics/shroud.html) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Hi, the recent edit you made to Net pay has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 15:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Bobby Petrino constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. CWii_{(Talk|Contribs)} 16:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC))

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Bobby Petrino, you will be blocked from editing. Enigma ^msg! 17:19, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

This is a shared company IP, so it's probably a specific individual causing your issues. --192.154.91.225 (talk) 18:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Yep, there's a hatnote at the top identifying it as a GSK IP. There must be a lot of vandals at your company. :) Enigma ^msg! 18:25, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Can't be helped, but I'll log in to cut down on the confusion. --192.154.91.225 (talk) 18:29, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

May 2008

Your recent edit to Business process outsourcing (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 19:59, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Gladys Kravitz has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Redfarmer (talk) 13:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Bill Richardson has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 19:53, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Marvel UK

The category of Marvel UK characters is for characters who have appeared in Marvel UK titles, these do not include Excalibur (comics) as these titles were produced by Marvel Comics not Marvel UK. --- Paulley (talk) 11:50, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

August 2008

Please don't add the DC cities and towns cat to Metropolis (comics) or Gotham City. Each has a self-titled cat that it's in which is a direct subcat of DCc&t.

- J Greb (talk) 21:58, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

May 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Compound annual growth rate, you may be blocked from editing. WackyWace ^talk 18:53, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Nomination of Hexaware Technologies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hexaware Technologies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hexaware Technologies (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:13, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

---