User talk:135.180.103.131

Hericium erinaceus[edit]

It is more constructive to discuss the relative value of new content and sources on the article talk page to allow other editors to comment. You and I can discuss here, if you wish, but you would need to show review sources - not individual primary research - to satisfy the encyclopedia. See WP:SCIRS for scientific consensus on a non-medical topic, and WP:MEDSCI for anything related to medical content (for which no good clinical reviews exist, as shown in this PubMed search).

Wikipedia is not a CV for individual scientists, WP:NOTCV, and is not a journal for presenting lab studies, WP:NOTJOURNAL #6-8. "Wikipedia is for the general reader... not a comprehensive medical or pharmaceutical resource". Zefr (talk) 23:58, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i'm writing here instead of on the talk page because i don't want it to instantly devolve into a Zefr pile-on instead of being about improving the article. i ask you to contribute the research section because apparently nothing anyone else writes is good enough for you; any attempts to create such a section is immediately shot down by you, personally. look at this page and tell me what color you see:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Zefr&target=Zefr&offset=&limit=500

anything that's not a reply or revert?

it's oh so easy to delete content. please understand that making even a correctly formatted contribution with citations is a lot of effort for most people. having your hard work destroyed feels bad. why should i bother when you will just delete it anyway? when is the last time you wrote anything constructive instead of just deleting other peoples' work? have you forgotten how? 135.180.103.131 (talk) 00:38, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia editors have varied contributions from minor copyediting to major deletions or additions. Keep in mind that editing is about content and sources, not editor behavior unless it is disruptive to mainstream science and editor consensus; WP:NPA. You could easily use the article talk page to post a draft with source(s) to allow anyone following the article to comment. There are no obligations for editors to comment. The H. erinaceus article is watched by 128 people.

If you think you have defensible medical content and sources, post a topic on WT:MED where experienced medical editors can comment. For a wider editorial discussion involving general science editors, use WP:RSN. Zefr (talk) 01:45, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i see one editor deleting contributions from many other editors. how is that "consensus" by any stretch of the word? 135.180.103.131 (talk) 01:52, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Starship IFT-2[edit]

Absolutely. Here you go. It can also be found in Archive 6 and 7. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:SpaceX_Starship/Archive_6 Jrcraft Yt (talk) 21:19, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.