User talk:.caiify3623.

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello, .caiify3623., and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Introduction and Getting started
Contributing to Wikipedia
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 00:57, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023[edit]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 10:59, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 03:25, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 20:19, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Problem[edit]

Why do I get edits reverted?! .caiify3623. (talk) 02:54, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For the reasons explained in the section 'August 2023', appearing immediately before this one. MrOllie (talk) 03:01, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oceanian microstates .caiify3623. (talk) 02:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. MrOllie (talk) 19:36, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why the page I created doesn't longer exist? .caiify3623. (talk) 23:06, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what can I do to keep this page existing? .caiify3623. (talk) 23:10, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You must base all additions on reliable sources. If you keep adding unsourced content, it will be removed and your account will be blocked again. MrOllie (talk) 23:12, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are the criteria less than 1000 km2 and less than 500k .caiify3623. (talk) 03:32, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org with your username and appeal.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Yamla (talk) 10:11, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

.caiify3623. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My block is no longer necessary because i understand what I'm blocked for, I will not do it again, and i will make productive contributions instead.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:13, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will convince Yamla and RickiBaltimore[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

.caiify3623. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I convince Yamla and RickiBaltimore that the block is no longer necessary because I will make contributions instead.caiify3623. (talk) 00:32, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQL ^{Query Me!} 15:47, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.caiify3623. (talk) 00:32, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are convincing me I should alter the block to include WP:CIR as a reason. --Yamla (talk) 00:37, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I convince RickiBaltimore that the block is no longer necessary because I will make contributions instead. .caiify3623. (talk) 02:57, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have modified the block to note the blatant WP:CIR issues. --Yamla (talk) 10:56, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What are the issues with WP:CIR? .caiify3623. (talk) 02:35, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Read that page and tell us what you think they are. Daniel Case (talk) 06:47, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm responsible for convincing[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

.caiify3623. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm responsible for convincing SQL, RickinBaltimore and Yamla that the block is no longer necessary because I will make useful contributions instead and understand that I have been blocked two times on my account and/or IP address for adding original research, I will not do it again..caiify3623. (talk) 23:48, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:13, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.caiify3623. (talk) 23:46, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This request is rather unlikely to result in an unblock as it does not demonstrate an understanding of why you were blocked - nor does it include a plan on how to avoid the situations/behaviors that led to your block. I would strongly suggest that you read the guide to appealing blocks before making another. As I have already declined a request from you, I will not decline this one - and will leave this open for another administrator to review. SQL ^{Query Me!} 00:05, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you are recommending me to read the "Composing your request to be unblocked"? .caiify3623. (talk) 03:07, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand for violating one of Wikipedia's policies[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

.caiify3623. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi everyone, my block is no longer necessary because I understand for violating one of Wikipedia policies, I will not do it again, and I will make useful contributions instead. .caiify3623. (talk) 03:12, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Repeating general platitudes back to us is only evidence that the reason for the block is correct and you lack the skills needed to participate here at this time. 331dot (talk) 08:42, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Artsakh[edit]

Can you remove Artsakh from List countries and dependencies by area ever since it doesn't exist anymore and it will be offically ceased to exist by 1st of January 2024? Mehmetberkgung (talk) 01:17, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Exclusion of Abkhazia and South Ossetia in the list of European countries by population[edit]

Can someone add these because I see they are excluded. I cannot edit and talk anymore because my block is gonna be forever. .caiify3623. (talk) 00:40, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What are the skills to participate?[edit]

Someone in my appeal block said that I lacked unknown skills to participate and I don't know what these are? .caiify3623. (talk) 00:55, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Western Sahara in Spanish speaking countries[edit]

why is western sahara not listed on the list of Spanish speaking countries? .caiify3623. (talk) 02:17, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is no concern of yours. You are blocked. --Yamla (talk) 10:24, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

.caiify3623. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I convince some administrators that my block is no longer necessary because I will make useful contributions instead, I understand for violating the WP:NOR policy, and Wikipedia articles must not contain original research, and this block was unfair, thanks.

Decline reason:

This unblock request is not substantially different than the others, and the unblock reasons and comments above apply to this one as well. Aoidh (talk) 16:26, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.caiify3623. (talk) 15:50, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strange thing[edit]

how the editor return for me while I'm blocked? It's so rare .caiify3623. (talk) 14:20, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of countries with fewer than 1,000,000 people[edit]

This is a list according to the CIA agent 2008

Country	Population	Area (km²/sq mi)	% of world	Location
Vatican City	821	0.5 km² (0.19 sq mi)	0%	Europe - Italic Peninsula
Niue	1492	260 km² (100 sq mi)	0%	Oceania - Polynesia
Tuvalu	11992	26 km² (10 sq mi)	0.0001%	Oceania - Polynesia
Nauru	13528	21 km² (8.1 sq mi)	0.0002%	Oceania - Micronesia
Palau	20892	459 km² (177 sq mi)	0.0003%	Oceania - Micronesia
Cook Islands	21750	236 km² (91 sq mi)	0.0003%	Oceania - Polynesia
San Marino	29615	61 km² (24 sq mi)	0.0004%	Europe - Italic Peninsula
Monaco	32671	2 km² (0.77 sq mi)	0.0004%	Europe
Liechtenstein	34247	160 km² (62 sq mi)	0.0004%	Europe
Saint Kitts and Nevis	39349	261 km² (101 sq mi)	0.0005%	Caribbean
Marshall Islands	61815	181 km² (70 sq mi)	0.0008%	Oceania - Micronesia
Antigua and Barbuda	69481	442 km² (171 sq mi)	0.0009%	Caribbean
Andorra	71822	468 km² (181 sq mi)	0.0009%	Europe
Dominica	72386	751 km² (290 sq mi)	0.0009%	Caribbean
Seychelles	81895	455 km² (176 sq mi)	0.001%	Africa - Indian Ocean
Grenada	89971	344 km² (133 sq mi)	0.0011%	Caribbean
Kiribati	107817	811 km² (313 sq mi)	0.0013%	Oceania - Micronesia
Federated States of Micronesia	107862	702 km² (271 sq mi)	0.0013%	Oceania - Micronesia
Tonga	116921	747 km² (288 sq mi)	0.0014%	Oceania - Polynesia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	118149	389 km² (150 sq mi)	0.0015%	Caribbean
Saint Lucia	170649	618 km² (239 sq mi)	0.0021%	Caribbean
São Tomé and Principe	199579	1,001 km² (386 sq mi)	0.0025%	Africa
Vanuatu	211971	12,189 km² (4,706 sq mi)	0.0026%	Oceania - Melanesia
Samoa	214265	2,831 km² (1,093 sq mi)	0.0026%	Oceania - Polynesia
Barbados	280926	431 km² (166 sq mi)	0.0035%	Caribbean
Belize	294385	22,966 km² (8,867 sq mi)	0.0036%	Central America
Iceland	301931	103,000 km² (40,000 sq mi)	0.0037%	Europe
Bahamas	305655	13,880 km² (5,360 sq mi)	0.0038%	Caribbean
Maldives	369031	298 km² (115 sq mi)	0.0046%	Asia - Indian Ocean
Brunei	374577	5,765 km² (2,226 sq mi)	0.0046%	Asia
Western Sahara	382617	266,000 km² (103,000 sq mi)	0.0047%	Africa
Malta	401880	316 km² (122 sq mi)	0.005%	Europe - Mediterranean
Cape Verde	423613	4,033 km² (1,557 sq mi)	0.0052%	Africa
Suriname	470784	163,820 km² (63,250 sq mi)	0.0058%	South America
Luxembourg	480222	2,586 km² (998 sq mi)	0.0059%	Europe
Djibouti	496374	23,200 km² (9,000 sq mi)	0.0061%	Africa
Equatorial Guinea	551201	28,051 km² (10,831 sq mi)	0.0068%	Africa
Solomon Islands	566842	28,896 km² (11,157 sq mi)	0.007%	Oceania - Melanesia
Montenegro	684736	13,812 km² (5,333 sq mi)	0.0084%	Europe - Balkan peninsula
Bahrain	708573	760 km² (290 sq mi)	0.0087%	Asia - Middle East
Comoros	711417	1,861 km² (719 sq mi)	0.0088%	Africa
Guyana	769095	214,969 km² (83,000 sq mi)	0.0095%	South America
Cyprus	788457	9,251 km² (3,572 sq mi)	0.0097%	Europe - Mediterranean
Qatar	907229	11,586 km² (4,473 sq mi)	0.0112%	Asia - Middle East
Fiji	918675	18,274 km² (7,056 sq mi)	0.0113%	Oceania - Melanesia

Stop[edit]

You have access to this talk page solely so you can contest your block. --Yamla (talk) 17:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contesting my block to get me unblocked[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

.caiify3623. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I convince several administrators that my block is no longer necessary because I will make useful contributions instead, I remained blocked because I added content that is not found in the source on various articles, I understand for violating the WP:SOCK policy, my block was unfair and Wikipedia's skills to participate on Wikipedia apply to my reason as well. 22:54, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

All this request does is reinforce WP:CIR concerns. As such, I'm revoking your access to this page. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:58, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.caiify3623. (talk) 22:54, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This does not even mention your violation of WP:SOCK and hardly references the WP:CIR concerns. --Yamla (talk) 22:55, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i updated my request to be unblocked .caiify3623. (talk) 23:00, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My block request is now substantially different than the others, and the reason for my block apply to my unblock request as well, I hope I get unblocked. .caiify3623. (talk) 23:08, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #81151 is closed.[edit]

User should review all of the many concerns raised and be prepared to address all of them. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:11, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Microstates in the Americas[edit]

Hello, .caiify3623.. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Microstates in the Americas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:African microstates[edit]

Hello, .caiify3623.. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:African microstates, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Microstates in the Americas[edit]

Hello, .caiify3623.. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Microstates in the Americas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:00, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:African microstates[edit]

Hello, .caiify3623.. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "African microstates".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]