User:ZaperaWiki44/sandbox/Quasi-star

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Size comparison of a hypothetical quasi-star to some of the largest known modern stars.

A quasi-star (QS),[1] or quasistar[2] (also called black hole star),[citation needed] is a hypothetical type of extremely massive and luminous star that may have existed early in the history of the Universe. Unlike modern stars, which are powered by nuclear fusion in their cores, a quasi-star's energy would come from material falling into a black hole at its core.[3]

Description[edit]

A quasi-star rendered with Celestia

A quasi-star would have resulted from the core of a large protostar collapsing into a black hole, where the outer layers of the protostar are massive enough to absorb the resulting burst of energy without being blown away or falling into the black hole, as occurs with modern supernovae. These intermediate-mass black holes have been suggested as the progenitors of modern supermassive black holes such as the one in the center of the Galaxy.[1]

Formation[edit]

Formation of quasi-stars could only happen early in the development of the Universe, before hydrogen and helium were contaminated by heavier elements; thus, they may have been very massive Population III stars, although some may have existed even prior to the formation of the first "normal" stars.[4]


Quasi-stars may have formed via monolithic collapse of atomic-cooling[5] dark matter halos with a viral temperature over 10,000 K,[4] drawing in enormous amounts of gas via gravity.

This can produce supermassive stars with over tens of thousands of solar masses.[6][7]

[8]

The formation of a quasi-star depends if whether the infall of gas is high enough to prevent a thermal equilibrium to be established in the central hydrostatic core of the atomic-cooling halo.[9] Otherwise, the supermassive star would instead collapse to become a direct collapse black hole.[9] [10]

(over 1 billion solar masses;[8] for reference, some small galaxies have only 5 million solar masses)[4][9] [10]


The inner core of the supermassive star forms a stellar-mass black hole with an initial mass between 5 and 100 M in a radiation pressure-supported envelope.[4] [8]


[4]

Once the black hole had formed at the core of the protostar with a part of it becoming a luminous central accretion disk,[5] it would continue generating a large amount of radiant energy from the infall of stellar material. This constant outburst of energy would counteract the force of gravity, creating an equilibrium similar to the one that supports modern fusion-based stars and causing the outer layers of the quasi-star to expand and cool down.[2]

The interior black hole may then continue accreting from the stellar envelope, while the accretion rate of the quasi-star will only be limited by the Eddington rate corresponding to the total mass of the configuration.[10]


Models from a 2023 paper, although this study did not follow the collapse of supermassive stars to late times, predict that it is unlikely that X-rays from the central black hole could halt the collapse of modelled stars (with final masses of (3.5–370)×103 M) because of large infall velocities that enclose most of the stellar mass so it will go into the black hole soon after birth. This would thus prevent the formation of a quasi-star that could create black hole seeds of up to a million solar masses, and instead become straight direct collapse black holes born with the mass at which their progenitors die.[11]

Properties[edit]

Stellar structure[edit]

[4]

[8]

[12]

Lifespan[edit]

Depending on models, quasi-stars would have had a short maximum lifespan, approximately 7 million years,[10] during which the core black hole would have grown to about 1,000–10,000 solar masses (2×1033–2×1034 kg).[3][2]

Mass[edit]

Depending on models, a quasi-star would have been at least 1,000.[2][3] almost 10 million solar masses at this point, but can be as high as up to about 100 million solar masses as the upper mass limit.[5] [8]

Mass loss[edit]

Extreme mass loss, as high [8]

Temperature[edit]

[8] At the time of their formation, quasi-stars are predicted to have had surface temperatures higher than 10,000 K (9,700 °C).[2][12]

Luminosity[edit]

[2] In the model, the luminosity is approximately equal to the Ed-dington luminosity at the boundary of the innermost convective layer[12]

[8]

At these temperatures, and with theses bolometric luminosities, each quasi-star would be about as luminous as a small galaxy.[3]

Radius[edit]

They have estimated radii of 3030 R. Because quasi-stars cool over time, they also grow larger in radius.

At these temperatures, and with a radius of approximately 800 thousand times that of the Sun (as large as the Solar System).[3]

Such stars would dwarf Mu Cephei, VV Cephei A, and VY Canis Majoris, three among the largest known modern stars.

[2]

[1]

Rotating[edit]

[2]

[5]

Accretion disk[edit]

The black hole's accretion disk would be geometrically thick, advective disk with a very high accretion rate.[1]

Outflows[edit]


[13]


The production of a jet may be mediated by rotation of poloidal magnetic fields in the BH and/or disk magnetosphere, similar to that occurring in AGN and GRBs. Such fields can effectively be transported from the outer regions to the center only by geometrically thick accretion flows (Cao 2011; McKinney et al. 2012; Tchekhovskoy et al. 2012).[1]

The jets produce gamma rays in the reconfinement shocks formed within 0.01-1 rQS , i.e. 1015 − 1017 cm.[1] As such, researches also proposed that quasi-star jets may be accounted for a large fraction of unidentified gamma-ray sources located at high latitudes, in which most of them are considered to be extragalactic.[1] Like blazars, they would produce nonthermal spectra at lower energies (optical-IR) dominated by the synchrotron mechanism and in the gamma-ray band by the inverse-Compton process. However, they can be distinguished from blazars depending on the ratio of the gamma-ray to the IR components and the presence of broad emission lines. Most of BL Lacertae objects are expected to have a low ratio and no broad emission lines.[1]


Evolution[edit]

[8] [13] [5]

As a quasi-star cools over time, its outer envelope would become transparent, until further cooling to a limiting temperature of roughly 5,000–4,000 K (4,730–3,730 °C) for Population III opacities or lower if metal-enriched,[2] as low as roughly 3,000 K for a solar metallicity (e.g Population I stars).[1] The limiting temperature would mark the end of the quasi-star's life since there is no hydrostatic equilibrium at or below this limiting temperature.[2] The object would then quickly dissipate by radiation pressure, leaving behind the intermediate mass black hole.[2]

Ball[edit]

A quasi-star with an initial mass 10000 M begins its life with an effective temperature of 14,300 K, a luminosity of 3.48×108 L and radius of 3,030 R with a M central black hole accreting at 10−4 M.[12]

The second feature, apparent in all but the first density profile in Fig. 1, is the density inversion in the outer layers. It appears once the photospheric temperature Tsurf drops below about 8000 K. From then, the surface opacity increases owing to hydrogen recombination.

Before the end of the evolution by 3.7 million years, these properties, along with the black hole's accretion rate, achieve their local limits, reaching 4,490 K and 40,700 R with a luminosity of 6.05×108 L and a black hole accretion rate of 3.7×10−4 M.[12] By 4.23 million years, the quasi-star's evolution terminates as the black hole reaches a final mass 1,194 M with a cavity mass of 3,360 M, but with a decreased accretion rate 3.53×10−4 M, with quasi-star's properties being 4,510 K and 39600 R with a luminosity of 5.81×108 L before hydrostatic equilibrium breaks down.

The physical reason for this upper limit remains elusive but we have made some progress in understanding it using a modified version of the Lane-Emden equation (see Section 4). The existence of the limit is certainly robust as it is does not depend on the total mass of the quasi-star over at least two orders of magnitude (see Section 5.4) nor on whether the envelope mass changes in time (see Section 5.3).[12]

Subsequent evolution[edit]

The material within the cavity, thus the Bondi radius of the black hole, would be already still moving towards the black hole, presumably accreting at its Eddington-limited rate.[12]

Fiacconi[edit]

In another model, quasi-stars with a relatively low mass might be able to form a central accretion disc and reach an equilibrium configuration but last shorter, for only few thousands of years before the accretion luminosity unbinds the surrounding envelope, with outflows then suppress the growth of the central black hole. This would result rather a mass for the black hole for 100–1,000 M.[5]

Demography[edit]

[13]

[1]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Czerny, Bozena; Janiuk, Agnieszka; Sikora, Marek; Lasota, Jean-Pierre (2012). "Quasi-Star Jets as Unidentified Gamma-Ray Sources". The Astrophysical Journal. 755 (1): L15. arXiv:1207.1560. Bibcode:2012ApJ...755L..15C. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/755/1/L15. S2CID 113397287.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Begelman, Mitch; Rossi, Elena; Armitage, Philip (2008). "Quasi-stars: accreting black holes inside massive envelopes". MNRAS. 387 (4): 1649–1659. arXiv:0711.4078. Bibcode:2008MNRAS.387.1649B. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13344.x. S2CID 12044015.
  3. ^ a b c d e Battersby, Stephen (29 November 2007). "Biggest black holes may grow inside 'quasistars'". NewScientist.com news service.
  4. ^ a b c d e f Begelman, M. C.; et al. (Jun 2006). "Formation of supermassive black holes by direct collapse in pre-galactic haloed". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 370 (1): 289–298. arXiv:astro-ph/0602363. Bibcode:2006MNRAS.370..289B. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10467.x. S2CID 14545390.
  5. ^ a b c d e f Fiacconi, Davide; Rossi, Elena M. (2017). "Light or heavy supermassive black hole seeds: The role of internal rotation in the fate of supermassive stars". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 464 (2): 2259–2269. arXiv:1604.03936. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2505.
  6. ^ Yasemin Saplakoglu (September 29, 2017). "Zeroing In on How Supermassive Black Holes Formed". Scientific American. Retrieved April 8, 2019.
  7. ^ Mara Johnson-Goh (November 20, 2017). "Cooking up supermassive black holes in the early universe". Astronomy. Retrieved April 8, 2019.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h i Dotan, Calanit; Rossi, Elena M.; Shaviv, Nir J. (2011). "A lower limit on the halo mass to form supermassive black holes". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 417 (4): 3035–3046. arXiv:1107.3562. Bibcode:2011MNRAS.417.3035D. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19461.x.
  9. ^ a b c Ball, Warrick H. (2012). "Quasi-stars and the Schönberg-Chandrasekhar limit". arXiv:1207.5972.
  10. ^ a b c d Schleicher, Dominik R. G.; Palla, Francesco; Ferrara, Andrea; Galli, Daniele; Latif, Muhammad (25 May 2013). "Massive black hole factories: Supermassive and quasi-star formation in primordial halos". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 558: A59. arXiv:1305.5923. Bibcode:2013A&A...558A..59S. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321949. S2CID 119197147.
  11. ^ Herrington, Nicholas P.; Whalen, Daniel J.; Woods, Tyrone E. (2023). "Modelling supermassive primordial stars with <SCP>mesa</SCP>". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 521: 463–473. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad572.
  12. ^ a b c d e f g Ball, Warrick H.; Tout, Christopher A.; Żytkow, Anna N.; Eldridge, John J. (2011-07-01). "The structure and evolution of quasi-stars: The structure and evolution of quasi-stars". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 414 (3): 2751–2762. arXiv:1102.5098. Bibcode:2011MNRAS.414.2751B. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18591.x.
  13. ^ a b c . doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17359.x. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)

External links[edit]