This template falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
This template needs some work. Everything is thrown in in a jumble. Let's think about adding some organization. Curious Blue (talk) 23:03, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. I'm just going to go straight ahead and edit.Aero13792468 (talk) 20:23, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What is the criteria (if any) for a figure being included in the list of "key figures"? While there are many important figures there are many others who really don't match any sensible definition of that term - they are all jumbled together and the list grows ever longer. Perhaps on this page (or a sub page specifically for the purpose) people could cite a couple of reliable sources and give reasons why a figure should be on that list. Meanwhile I'm tempted to prune that list to a more manageable and useful size. Chris Fynn (talk) 07:03, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
