Template talk:Taxonomy/Homo
No subject[edit]
The paraphyly of genus Australopithecus with respect to genus Homo (not the other way around) is actually a foregone conclusion. See e.g. [1][2] and [3]. Suggestions?
- Whether or not this is the scientific consensus doesn't affect the placement of the genus Homo as currently defined. If there's a consensus in future to expand the circumscription of Homo to include species currently placed in Australopithecus, then the parent of Homo could change, I guess. We'll have to see. Peter coxhead (talk) 22:16, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Adding section header. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:38, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Add subtribe clade Hominina[edit]
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I'd like to suggest that we add the subtribe clade Hominina that includes the Homo genus and our extinct relatives the Australopithicine. 193.115.83.189 (talk) 23:03, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Not done Given that your edit to Hominina was reverted this is apparently controversial. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:08, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
