This page transcludes a subset of the nominations found on the page of all the approved nominations for the "Did you know" section of the Main Page. It only transcludes the nominations filed under dates of the most recent week. The page is intended to allow editors to easily review recent nominations that may not be displaying correctly on the complete page of approved nominations if that page's contents are causing the page to hit the post-expand include size limit.
Wow, I love this hook. Article is long enough and 5x expanded as of today, Earwig finds no copyvio, sourcing looks good and I'm AGFing on the languages I can't read (DeepL translation shows me it lines up). Hook is cited, again AGF because I can't be certain, given that I can't read Russian, and your QPQ is good. Zanahary (talk) 21:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@AirshipJungleman29: This saint's day is June 28. Would you mind dropping this in the SOHA for that day? --evrik(talk) 02:19, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This was inspired by Sammi Brie's recent Ground Round submission. And, not really a COI, but I do have fond memories of my father taking me to lunch at the Union Square Tad's when I was a kid and he brought me to work with him.
Created by RoySmith (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 38 past nominations.
Other problems: - Per WP:NYPOST, the NY Post is a generally unreliable source. Much as I don't agree with the decision, there was a consensus that the NYP isn't reliable. I suggest replacing it.
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Overall: @RoySmith: Nice work. There is only one issue with this nomination, which I've mentioned above. Epicgenius (talk) 17:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, NY Post references removed, thanks for the review. RoySmith(talk) 17:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Epicgenius I hope you don't mind, but I've done a bit more work on this since your review. Please let me know if I've introduced any new issues. RoySmith(talk) 21:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Overall: New enough, long enough. Earwig detects 51.6% match due to a cited passage in the article so that is not a problem. Quotes that result in a match are cited. The hooks are cited and are interesting. Preference for ALT0 and ALT2. QPQ has been completed! Great work, cheers! Ornithoptera (talk) 19:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source: See Huang, Xian (2021-01-30). 遵义会议会址确认记 [Confirmation of the Site of the Zunyi Conference]. People's Daily Overseas Edition 人民日报海外版 (in Chinese). or Pan, Kaimao (2012). 遵义会议期间红军总政治部旧址简介 [Site of the Political Directorate of the Chinese Red Army during the Zunyi Conference]. Zhongguo Diming 中国地名. No. 05. p. 13..
Looks good to me, long enough, new enough, good sourcing and well written. I think ALT1 is more interesting as a hook. Luiysia (talk) 17:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just want to point out that the linked source says "almost broke the internet", which is an important qualifier; other sources in the article such as [1][2] say simply "broke the internet", so perhaps one of them should be used for this hook reference. Ligaturama (talk) 08:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Clear at 100px: - not really, and I feel it is redundant here.
QPQ: None required.
Overall: Earwigs show 53.4% possible, but it's a case of false positive as the matched texts are part of a quoted paragraph, so we're good. And it's a bad source to be added here in this nom (paid, and also doesn't fully align with the hook as is, as pointed above by another user). However, sources used in the article are better, while another one doesn't explicitly mention the hook, but 2 does. Another point to be noted here is the number of lines of the code. It varies by publication. Although from the picture provided, yes there are 17 total markdowns, but some of them are empty, so it comes down to 11 "actual" lines. But some sources I checked, even outside this article, do not mention the specific number of lines, and the ones that do, 2 of which are also sourced in the article, have different numbers (17). Also, the article had some copy editing issues, which I've fixed. By the way, you may consider improving the sourcing style on this one (as it's also a GA nominee). Such as interlinking the publications, or consider introducing journal or book citations as well. But for my money, DYK seems good to go, however, the current blurb needs to be modified to something like ALT0a ... that in 2016, the removal of a few lines of code briefly "broke the Internet"? X (talk) 04:57, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Xoak Thank you for the review! This is my first ever submission to DYK so I appreciate the thorough comments. I will go ahead and edit the blurb as suggested. Best, ~Liancetalk 16:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Liance:, That's great! By the way a few friendly notes for future noms, when an ALT blurb is proposed, you can simply just reply with your support for that blurb or oppose or express your opinion on it. No need to alter your ALT0 (which is the original hook), and notice how I added "a" beside ALT0, since it's pretty much the same fact with minor tweaks. But if the fact differs totally, then it'd be listed as ALT1, ALT2 and so forth. And if you remove anything from the original hook after the review is done, you should mention it for historical/future references (i.e., the removal of the image). Anyway, thank you for your creation and inviting you to contribute to more DYKs. Regards.
New enough, long enough, very well-sourced, copy-right compliant (Earwig 7.4%), very presentable. Hook is interesting. Images are properly licensed. No QPQ necessary. Foreign sources AGF. (I put some further comment on the talk page; they're not related to the DYK criteria, but may be helpful.) Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 19:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Article is new and long enough. Its neutral, BLP-compliant, and is copyvio-free (the 51.9% result from Earwig appears to be the list of publications, not copied prose). Hook is good, sourced in the Early life and education section with an inline citation. Image is used in the article's infobox and is correctly licensed. QPQ has been done. - JuneGloom07Talk 18:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1: ... that Sampdoria soccer player Tori DellaPeruta scored four goals in one game this year – with one goal assisted by her sister Talia(both pictured)? Source: ref9 / ref2
... that children as young as three were killed in the Great Genna Martyrdom(pictured) in 1622?
Source: Roldán-Figueroa, Rady (2021). "Background: Catholic Missions in Japan". The Martyrs of Japan: Publication History and Catholic Missions in the Spanish World (Spain, New Spain, and the Philippines, 1597–1700). Studies in the History of Christian Traditions. Vol. 195. Brill. pp. 13–34. doi:10.1163/9789004458062. ISBN 978-90-04-45806-2.
"Twenty- seven Japanese laymen and laywomen
were executed in addition to four Koreans; five of the victims were children
Overall: Looks good. Nice work. AGF on the offline hook ALT0 source and that you will complete the QPQ you started. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
... that Franz Liszt's female admirers would fight over his cigar stubs and coffee dregs as souvenirs?
Source: "The behaviour of his audiences has been compared to the mass hysteria associated with revivalist meetings or 20th-century rock stars, and prompted Heine to identify the phenomenon as ‘Lisztomania’. Female admirers sought souvenirs in the form of hair clippings, cigar stubs and the dregs from his coffee cups." Eckhardt, Maria; Mueller, Rena Charnin; Walker, Alan (2001). "§8: The Glanzzeit, 1839–47". Liszt, Franz [Ferenc]. Grove Music Online. doi:10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.48265. ISBN978-1-56159-263-0.
Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by Ligaturama (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
ALT2: ... that Herschel was actually a series of sea lions in the 1980s and 1990s? Source: Gammon, Katharine. "Herschel, the Very Hungry Sea Lion". Hakai Magazine
Comment: I use Chuck Norris facts in ALT0 as my quirky way of telling readers that he plays a hero in the film, while ALT1 is merely a word-for-word hook derived from the THR source's title indicating that all three principal actors have joined the cast
Created by Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Reviewing... (I haven't heard a Chuck Norris meme in years) ~~lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 17:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Passed criteria: The article is new enough, long enough, not affected by DYK-eligibility problems, verifiable and NOR, copyvio-free with correctly attributed quotes. The hook is cited to RS, interesting, concise.
Remarks, @Nineteen Ninety-Four guy: (1) I think the Premise section should be rewritten to not give undue weight to THR. (2) William Strong did not directly tell THR of the biohazard threads but rather told Mier who forwarded the story. (3) This might be a language issue from my part, but should the hook not be
as in the movie cannot flee/escape from Chuck Norris? Also, I removed the link to the Chuck Norris facts article to add a little IYKYK. You are welcome to retain the original link. Best wishes, ~~lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 18:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC); 18:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Lol1VNIO: Thanks for taking this review. Your concerns have been addressed. I also welcome your minor revision on ALT0, which is more clear than the previous version, tho I think the decision whether to include that Norris fact wikilink is probably best left for a DYK prepper to decide. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 21:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Nineteen Ninety-Four guy: Thank you! I'm pleased with your revisions. Passed ALT0b either as is or with similar linking scheme to Chuck Norris facts like with ALT0, prepper decides. Best wishes, ~~lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 05:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Overall: Earwig's clear, long enough, new enough, sourced well, and gtg. The Graun really needs to get its reporting up though, "Metro did something that had yet to be done in this rap battle: he apologized" might be the most damning indictment of J Cole's role in the beef I've seen. AryKun (talk) 05:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Article looks good. Hooks is interesting and checks out; however, out of the two sentences in the article that make this claim, none have a citation immediately following; since you're using the Depaulis source, you should put it after "which unlike polis remained popular to this day". (However, the quote from Max Nelson needs a citation afterwards too.) QPQ checks out. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 16:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Generalissima, I am not sure if I fully understand what you mean - end of paragraph citations are fine AFAIK for short paragraphs where there are no other sources. That said, I've added a direct quotation relevant to the hook's claim to one of the refs - I hope will address the main issue. Diff. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Piotrus Usually, yes, but WP:DYKG says that sentences containing the hook must be cited. It's irritating; that being said, all is good now. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 02:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
... that the Armenian Radio jokes are neither about radio nor are they Armenian? Source: Draitser, Emil (1998). Taking penguins to the movies: ethnic humor in Russia. Humor in life and letters series. Detroit: Wayne State University Press. p. 21. ISBN 978-0-8143-2327-4.
GTG. Interesting and well-written GA, main hook checks out, AGF on the ALT1. Earwig finds nothing, QPQ done. Johnbod (talk) 17:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Overall: Both article need end-of-sentence cites for the fact of him discovering the city. The source confirms the claim ("He discovered the Shang deposits at Daxinzhuang"). The source is a doctoral dissertation, but it seems to have a decent number of citations according to Scholar, so I think it's fine to use. Earwig's clear for both articles and no other issues I can see, so gtg once the end-of-sentence cites are added. AryKun (talk) 13:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@AryKun: Oops! Added end of sentence cites. Thank you! Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 13:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Date, hook, length works out on both, QPQs done, no close paraphrase found. --Soman (talk) 21:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
References
^浅見みなほ (31 December 2020). "アクション監督:谷垣健治(前編)「香港映画の現場を見て『この中にいたい』と思った」" [Action director: Kenji Tanigaki (Part 1) : I saw the set of a Hong Kong film and thought, "I wanna be a part of this."] (in Japanese). Natalie. Archived from the original on 8 March 2024. Retrieved 15 May 2024. そういう意味では「ここからスタントマンになりました」と言える転機だったと思います。本当はアクション監督3人の推薦が必要なんですけど、トン・ワイっていうアクション監督が推薦してくれて、裏口入学みたいな形で入れてもらいました(笑)。 / アクション監督を務めた「るろうに剣心」シリーズの最新作「るろうに剣心 最終章 The Final」は4月23日、「るろうに剣心 最終章 The Beginning」は6月4日より全国ロードショーとなる。「G.I.ジョー:漆黒のスネークアイズ」は2021年10月22日に全米公開される予定。 [I think it was a turning point where I can finally say that "I became a stuntman". In fact, you need recommendations from three action directors (to debut as a stuntman), but I was able to get in through a backdoor entrance thanks to the recommendation of action choreographer Stephen Tung. It was like a backdoor admission. / The latest installment of the Rurouni Kenshin film series, titled Rurouni Kenshin: The Final, in which he (Tanigaki) served as an action director, will be released nationwide in Japan on 23 April. Besides, Rurouni Kenshin: The Beginning will have its nationwide release on 4 June. Snake Eyes: G.I. Joe Origins, another film he (Tanigaki) worked on, is scheduled for a release in the United States on 22 October 2021.]