Template:Did you know nominations/Sālote Lupepauʻu

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:24, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Sālote Lupepauʻu[edit]

(

)

Queen Sālote Lupepauʻu

... that Queen Salote College was named after the Tongan Queen Sālote Lupepauʻu (pictured) who was named after the British Queen Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz?

ALT1 ... that Tonga's Queen Sālote Lupepauʻu (pictured) was named after the British Queen Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz?

Reviewed: Wube Haile Maryam

Created by KAVEBEAR (talk). Self-nominated at 22:50, 9 September 2016 (UTC).

Comment only As the first part of the hook is not very interesting, I've added a shorter ALT1 without it. Edwardx (talk) 00:30, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: I'm assuming good faith on the offline sources (majority of article - including the hook - is cited to offline sources). From what I can tell, the sources support the material in the article and the article does not appear to plagiarize. I prefer the original hook. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 15:53, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

@ONUnicorn:I reviewed Wube Haile Maryam already. Also if you assuming good faith on the hook, the tick should be AGF not Query on the "Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing" line. KAVEBEAR (talk) 16:04, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Ooops, sorry for missing the QPQ. As for the red x on the copyright violations line, that's an error in the template, that you can't put anything other than y and not have the red x appear. I've changed it to Y to make it more clear. All DYK criteria met, hook is good to go. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 16:21, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. KAVEBEAR (talk) 19:14, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

To DYK Preper: I prefer the original hook as well. KAVEBEAR (talk) 19:14, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

KAVEBEAR, as well as who exactly? No one else has expressed a preference for the original hook. Edwardx (talk) 22:12, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

ONUnicorn: "I prefer the original hook.". KAVEBEAR (talk) 22:33, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Oops. Sorry KAVEBEAR. Please accept my apologies. Edwardx (talk) 22:39, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

No problem. KAVEBEAR (talk) 22:42, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

In case there are any confusion this has been approved. See green tick above in middle of sentence. KAVEBEAR (talk) 07:39, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

I pulled this from p3 because the image licensing is incomplete and also dubious given that the site from which it is taken claims copyright over it. Gatoclass (talk) 15:07, 6 October 2016 (UTC)