Template:Did you know nominations/New Zealand Young Farmers
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:34, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Withdrawn
New Zealand Young Farmers[edit]
- ... that the national organisation New Zealand Young Farmers has a televised contest where young farmers answer questions, do farm work sessions, solve problems, and show their business skills?
- Reviewed: William Lechmere
- Comment: This was expanded during the end of an AfD.
Created/expanded by Grutness (talk). Nominated by SL93 (talk) at 23:37, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
| Format | Citation | Neutrality | Interest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imzadi 1979 → | Imzadi 1979 → | Imzadi 1979 → |
| Length | Newness | Adequate citations |
Formatted citations |
Reliable sources |
Neutrality | Plagiarism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Imzadi 1979 → | Imzadi 1979 → |
- The hook is not cited in the article. Footnote 3 only verifies the winners list, but the rest of that paragraph is not support by a raw list of the winners. A news article that discusses the contest itself would work, but until one is found and added, I can't verify the text. Additionally, the first footnote is given as being from stuff.co.nz, when it should use the Manawatu Standard as the source. Imzadi 1979 → 01:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- The article is in a sorry state then. Very disappointing that I assumed good faith on the part of an experienced editor that is also an admin. I check that stuff all of the time in my DYK reviews and DYK noms, but this time I fucked up badly. Consider this withdrawn. SL93 (talk) 01:56, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- One additional issue: the logo. I just looked on the organization's website, and that's not the logo in use, even though that's the stated source. Imzadi 1979 → 02:02, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- The article is in a sorry state then. Very disappointing that I assumed good faith on the part of an experienced editor that is also an admin. I check that stuff all of the time in my DYK reviews and DYK noms, but this time I fucked up badly. Consider this withdrawn. SL93 (talk) 01:56, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- The hook is not cited in the article. Footnote 3 only verifies the winners list, but the rest of that paragraph is not support by a raw list of the winners. A news article that discusses the contest itself would work, but until one is found and added, I can't verify the text. Additionally, the first footnote is given as being from stuff.co.nz, when it should use the Manawatu Standard as the source. Imzadi 1979 → 01:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)