Template:Did you know nominations/Melaleuca wilsonii

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 13:45, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Melaleuca wilsonii[edit]

Melaleuca wilsonii, Maranoa Gardens

5x expanded by Gderrin (talk), Casliber (talk), Melburnian (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 13:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC).

  • Moved to twelfth of March to reflect start of expansion. George Ho (talk) 20:47, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Sorry 'bout that. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:34, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
  • The article is long enough, adequately expanded within the timeframe and is stable. QPQ is done. The hook is short enough and the fact is cited to a reliable offline source. It's not the most attention grabbing of hooks, though. Can anything better be found? The image has an appropriate license & works fine at the size. There are a few things in the article that worry me. The lead has several statements that aren't referenced in the text, including the point of view that it is "one of the most attractive of the genus" and the fact that it's "widely cultivated", which doesn't appear fully supported by sources. The first paragraph of the description needs references. Duplication detector pulled up several instances of stretches of repetition from sources, and on closer inspection some sentences appear to be pulled together by nearly duplicating more than one source. Espresso Addict (talk) 22:40, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
can be tricky with only a limited number of synonyms - I will look at this in a few hours when I have hte books next to me. cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:22, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
update - changed to "often" cultivated - added a ref. removed the "attractive" (and included that ref another way) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:39, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
  • New reviewer needed to check Cas Liber's updates; will need to recheck close paraphrasing. Espresso Addict has only made a single edit in April and we have to assume won't be back. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:00, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Based in part on EA's review already, I'm happy to confirm those edits and sign this one off. Miyagawa (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2015 (UTC)