Template:Did you know nominations/Judith Donath
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 02:06, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Judith Donath[edit]
- ... that Judith Donath (pictured) has explored the use of artificial emotions in avatars and their potential use in online advertising?
Created/expanded by Dr.K. (talk), Stevertigo (talk). Nominated by Dr.K. (talk) at 15:59, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Article just makes 5x expansion, date good, hook good, and many excellent refs. The only question is the final statement in the article, which needs a reference. (I added "citation needed" tag for now.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by NearTheZoo (talk • contribs)
- Thank you very much NearTheZoo. That particular statement was in the original stub, prior to my expansion of the article. I kept it because it was a cute fact. Following your request at this review, I have added a reference from Wikimania Proceedings:JD1. I realise this is a meta-reference and as such it is not of industrial strength. Therefore I will remove the whole fact from the article if you think this fact is not important enough or supported well enough, which may well be the case. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 21:53, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Good enough for me! :) Good article, and in my opinion, DYK nomination is good to go.NearTheZoo (talk) 21:58, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you very much NearTheZoo. That particular statement was in the original stub, prior to my expansion of the article. I kept it because it was a cute fact. Following your request at this review, I have added a reference from Wikimania Proceedings:JD1. I realise this is a meta-reference and as such it is not of industrial strength. Therefore I will remove the whole fact from the article if you think this fact is not important enough or supported well enough, which may well be the case. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 21:53, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
