Template:Did you know nominations/Frances Ann Stewart

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:33, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Frances Ann Stewart

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that although New Zealand activist Frances Ann Stewart considered herself a "pioneer" for women, she believed that not all women should receive the right to vote?

• Reviewed: Deng Liqun

5x expanded by 97198 (talk). Self nominated at 16:57, 13 September 2014 (UTC).

• 5x expansion is new enough and long enough. NPOV. QPQ done. All paras are cited and the hook is cited and backed up by the source. Dup detector found no close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations or plagiarism. However, I'm a little concerned that the article relies almost entriely on one source and that that is another encyclopedia. Another secondary source or two would be nice. Edwardx (talk) 22:56, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

• @Edwardx: Thanks for the review. I've added two more sources – hopefully that's sufficient as information about her life seems fairly sparse. 97198 (talk) 11:33, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

• New enough, long enough (5x expansion). All paragraphs cited (except the lead). Content of the hook is verified within the article by a reliable source as inline citations. Additionally, per the above, additional sources have been added to the article. Comparison using Earwig's Copyvio Detector reveals these results. As evidenced upon comparing the article with this source using the detector, there is some close paraphrasing in the article relative to the source. However, the source is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 New Zealand Licence, so it's OK per Wikipedia:Plagiarism, which states "Add in-text attribution when you copy or closely paraphrase another author's words or flow of thought, unless the material lacks creativity or originates from a free source". NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:16, 19 September 2014 (UTC)