Template:Did you know nominations/Dedham Covenant

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:18, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Dedham Covenant

(

)

... that the Dedham Covenant was meant to be eternally binding? Lockridge page 7

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Avtar Singh Bhurji
Comment: Again, I will AGF all sources I can't access.

Converted from a redirect by Slugger O'Toole (talk). Nominated by Miraclepine (talk) at 17:13, 8 January 2020 (UTC).

Article is new enough and long enough. Hook fact is interesting and appropriately cited inline to an offline hook for which I will AGF. Spotchecks on some of the available sources reveal no copyvio or close para-phrasing concerns. Some tidying is needed in the referencing though: Smith 1936 is not provided in the Works cited. Otherwise, nice work. Harrias ^talk 20:55, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

@Harrias: I found the book written by Mr. Smith in 1936 @Slugger O'Toole: uses in several Dedham articles and put it in the works cited section. Anything else? ミラ P 01:45, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, missed the ping on this one. Looks good to go now. Harrias ^talk 22:49, 30 January 2020 (UTC)